Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On Mueller investigation, Trump should fight fire with fire
American Thinker ^ | June 22, 2017 | Karin McQuillan

Posted on 06/22/2017 8:45:39 AM PDT by detective

John Eastman, law professor at Chapman University, writes in American Greatness this week that the powers invested in Special Counsel Mueller to investigate "Russian hacking/collusion/obstruction poses grave dangers to our body politic and our liberty."  His advice to President Trump: Fight fire with fire.  Turn the law and the courts back on your opponents.  Trump is being investigated without any probable cause of a crime.  The Obama administration, in contrast, is a target-rich arena of criminal activity.

It is unconstitutional to issue a search warrant when there has been no crime and there is no probable cause.  But that is exactly what President Trump's DOJ has inflicted on the president and his team with Mueller's special investigation.  It was not just cowardice, but folly for the DOJ to buckle to the left-wing media's hysterical insistence to investigate our president's alleged collusion with the FSB.

According to Professor Eastman:

The special counsel will not to track down the details of a crime known to have been committed and determine "who dunnit," but will scour the personal and business affairs of a select group of people – the President of the United States, members of his family, his business associates, and members of his presidential campaign and transition teams – to see if any crime can be found (or worse, manufactured by luring someone into making a conflicting statement at some point). This is not a proper use of prosecutorial power, but a "witch hunt," as President Trump himself correctly observed. Or, to put it more in terms of legalese, this special prosecutor has effectively been given a "writ of assistance" and the power to exercise a "general warrant" against this select group of people, including the President of the United States

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: clinton; democrats; mueller; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
"Those who counseled President Trump to not prosecute Hillary Clinton said a Clinton investigation would distract the White House from furthering Trump's positive agenda.  That was a strong argument – then.  But as Professor Eastman points out, it backfired.  Perhaps Trump's civility was taken as a sign of weakness.  Hillary launched the lie that the Russians made her lose the election.  Democrats instigated this phony Russian collusion investigation of Trump, precisely in an effort to distract the White House and halt the Trump agenda.  The best defense is to return to offense.

President Trump has the responsibility to re-establish the rule of law in our country, and he will have the enthusiastic backing of his base if he does so.  It is time to end Democrats' politically motivated abuse of the law.  Stop the Mueller investigation, and go after Obama Inc.'s multiple crimes."

Excellent, must read article.

1 posted on 06/22/2017 8:45:39 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective
"Those who counseled President Trump to not prosecute Hillary Clinton said a Clinton investigation would distract the White House from furthering Trump's positive agenda. That was a strong argument – then.

DISTRACTION? Huh? The Russian plot hatched by Klintoon and carreied out by #44, Soros, McStain, Schmuckie, Piglosi, the RAT MEDIA is NOT A DISTRACTION????????
2 posted on 06/22/2017 8:48:00 AM PDT by Cheerio (#44, The unknown President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Gives me a little more confidence knowing that Trump has Jay Sekulow on his team.


3 posted on 06/22/2017 8:54:21 AM PDT by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

Jeff Sessions should....never mind.


4 posted on 06/22/2017 8:56:11 AM PDT by cp124 (Democrats & MSM: Make America Hate Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: detective
Those who counseled President Trump to not prosecute Hillary Clinton said a Clinton investigation would distract the White House from furthering Trump's positive agenda.

I don't believe anyone really gave this advice to President Trump.

A more likely scenario is that the DOJ filled him in on the practical reality of pursuing a criminal case against a former Secretary of State who would have the right to call any and all witnesses -- and present any and all evidence (including highly classified intelligence materials) -- in a trial. The prosecution would be forced to shield so much evidence in the case that the defendant would legitimately claim that she is unable to mount a defense.

5 posted on 06/22/2017 8:58:10 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Shame on Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for agreeing to this and how is he complicit in a criminal investigation that goes against the President??


6 posted on 06/22/2017 8:59:26 AM PDT by Antipolitico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cp124

When, if ever, will jeff sesssions wake up and do his job? Either go to work or resign and let someone else enforce the law against obama and clinton.


7 posted on 06/22/2017 9:00:28 AM PDT by Okeydoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective
P.S. -- The best way for Trump to deal with the Mueller investigation is to ignore it completely, except for an occasional Twitter post to poke fun at the Democrats and their contrived witch hunt.

We've probably heard the last of James Comey.

Mueller may retire on the job without even telling anyone.

8 posted on 06/22/2017 9:00:37 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

He’s right. An aggressive move to begin investigating Hillary and Obama crimes would no doubt force them to stand down.


9 posted on 06/22/2017 9:02:01 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

“I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t,” Trump said. “She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways.”

Trump needs to reestablish the rule of law and prosecute the Clintons for their many crimes.

Trump needs to understand how evil the Clintons really are.


10 posted on 06/22/2017 9:04:51 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cp124

Jeff Sessions should.... anything. Anything at all. Helloooo? Anyone home? Jeff? JEFF?


11 posted on 06/22/2017 9:06:01 AM PDT by chris37 (Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective
Oh scheming, deceitful DemoRats--- Trump has a magnificent boomerang effect over him.


12 posted on 06/22/2017 9:06:15 AM PDT by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Bwahahaha. You would think the DOJ would be just.


13 posted on 06/22/2017 9:08:17 AM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
Unfortunately, the only antidote may be to fight fire with fire. President Trump: Perhaps it is time to make good on that old pledge to appoint a special prosecutor to look into the Clinton "matters" after all. And while you're at it, add in referrals to the grand jury for the contempt of Congress committed by the IRS's Lois Lerner and former Attorney General Eric Holder, an FBI investigation of the destruction of government documents and servers in the midst of the IRS scandal, an investigation into the alleged perjury committed by IRS Commissioner John Koskinen in testimony about those matters given under oath to Congress, an "obstruction of justice" investigation against former Attorney General Eric Holder and others (and related perjury charges against Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez) for allegedly ordering that an egregious voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party be dropped shortly before a default judgment was about to be entered in the government's favor, etc., etc., etc.

14 posted on 06/22/2017 9:08:20 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
-- A more likely scenario is that the DOJ filled him in on the practical reality of pursuing a criminal case against a former Secretary of State who would have the right to call any and all witnesses -- and present any and all evidence (including highly classified intelligence materials) -- in a trial. --

Scooter Libby tried to pull all sorts of classified material into trial in his defense. It's a hassle, but managable. Nothing classified was presented to the jury or the public.

Hillary has already laid out her defense. It's the Sgt. Schultz defense.

15 posted on 06/22/2017 9:09:38 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
-- We've probably heard the last of James Comey. --

Senate Judiciary is going to ramp up an investigation in Trump abuse of power / obstruction of justice (whatever term you prefer), and Comey's inside circle is specifically named in preliminary letters.

June 9, 2017 Feinstein Letter - Recommending Senate Judicary investigate Trump obstruction accusation

June 13, 2017 Grassley Letter - Agrees to review firing of Comey, etc.

The Administration has referenced both Mr. Comey's handling of the Clinton investigation and Russia investigation as factors in his decision to fire Mr. Comey. Specifically, the memo from Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein explicitly cited Mr. Comey's presumption in announcing a prosecutorial decision and assuming the dual role of investigator and prosecutor, and Mr. Comey's failure to recognize and admit that error. In addition, the President's termination letter explicitly referenced Mr. Comey's private assurances that the President was not the subject of an investigation. That reference, combined with Mr. Comey's testimony last week that he refused the President's asks to state that fact publicly, make it clear that the President was not happy with Mr. Comey's actions on that issue, and frankly, that makes perfect sense. If "unnamed sources" in the press were whipping up a frenzy by falsely claiming I was under investigation, I would want law enforcement to correct the record too.

16 posted on 06/22/2017 9:12:29 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Hillary has already laid out her defense. It's the Sgt. Schultz defense.

You mean the Bill Cosby defense. "I'm old! I'm sick! I'm dying! I'm having seizures! Prison is not equipped to care for me! It's cruel and unusual punishment to send me there at my age!"


17 posted on 06/22/2017 9:12:38 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: discostu

For your enjoyment


18 posted on 06/22/2017 9:13:14 AM PDT by Principled (OMG I'm so tired of all this winning....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
For those counting on Trey Gowdy, surprise!
I promised Bob Mueller Tuesday night that I would not do anything wittingly or unwittingly that interfered with his probe.
Gowdy: Trump asking to be cleared at the beginning of an investigation is inappropriate
19 posted on 06/22/2017 9:14:23 AM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
-- You mean the Bill Cosby defense. --

That too. But she rehearsed "I know nothing" during the campaign.

20 posted on 06/22/2017 9:15:12 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson