To: drewh
I find man buns loathsome.
2 posted on
06/20/2017 12:51:42 PM PDT by
LydiaLong
To: LydiaLong
3 posted on
06/20/2017 12:53:08 PM PDT by
drewh
To: LydiaLong
What if they put him in a men’s romper?
8 posted on
06/20/2017 12:56:14 PM PDT by
Calamari
(Pass enough laws and everyone is guilty of something.)
To: LydiaLong
No fat Barbies or Ken? Mattel is engaging in Thin-ism.
9 posted on
06/20/2017 12:58:32 PM PDT by
LydiaLong
To: LydiaLong
12 posted on
06/20/2017 12:59:14 PM PDT by
Disambiguator
(Keepin' it analog.)
To: LydiaLong
I find man buns loathsome
___________________________
Me too, unless it’s worn by John Snow..:)
36 posted on
06/20/2017 1:16:46 PM PDT by
KittenClaws
( Normalcy Bias. Do you have it?)
To: LydiaLong
“I find man buns loathsome.”
After meeting several men thusly equipped I now take the man bun to mean, unemployed or lowly employed and living at home.
To: LydiaLong
What is funny about Mattel doing the man bun is that again they are behind the times. I think man buns are out after hitting big 2 years ago. However, changing up Ken to get more buyers is a great capitalistic approach and wish them well. I have their stock so I am biased.
51 posted on
06/20/2017 1:33:01 PM PDT by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: LydiaLong
68 posted on
06/20/2017 2:12:07 PM PDT by
Impala64ssa
(Islamophobic? NO! IslamABHORic)
To: LydiaLong
I would wager that there are not many Trump voters among that type.
To: LydiaLong
Could the man bun become more loathed than the mullet?
88 posted on
06/20/2017 4:15:41 PM PDT by
Crucial
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
