Posted on 06/20/2017 6:41:00 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
U.S. District Court Judge Derrick Watson has cut back the injunction he issued against President Donald Trump's revised travel ban order, Politico is reporting.
Watson's move comes after the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld his injunction, but noted portions that blocked the administration from reviewing vetting procedures were too broad, according to the website.
The judge narrowed the injunction clearing the way for the administration to conduct internal reviews of other nation's vetting procedures for visa applicants while the case is being reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court, CNN reported.
Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly has called the move a "big win," but others were more cautious.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Hopefully, these Leftist judges will be held accountable should any future terrorists whose entry they’ve sponsored be successful in killing American citizens.
The Ca killer terrorists went through 5 interviews...but none were in person...it was all paperwork.
So they got here with all the vetting done before they got to the door.
Trump should go ahead and order a roundup of more illegals and snare any new arrivals from the listed countries...
This is about national security and the security of the public.
other nation’s vetting procedures for visa applicants
Because we depend on other nations to do the vetting for us. I agree, it’s absurd but that’s what we do.
Why in Christ’s name should we give a damn about other nations’ immigration policies????????????
I guess the judge is another globalist.
I agree with you, what they do wherever else is of no concern for the US, period. We are a sovereign nation. Of course if we adopted the immigration rules of say Mexico or North Korea, we would not be in line with the judges thinking. He would be more in line with Germany or Canada I guess. In case the judge is following my comment, which I 100% doubt, I don’t give a darn what they do elsewhere.
Why Trump needs to get busy appointing federal judges “toot sweet.”
yea well too late to start narrowing your injunction. SCOTUS gonna smack your injunction all the way down.
The 9th Circuit Opinion and Order was to this judge, it took him this long to do what the 9th Circuit told him to do. Doing it is no surprise either, i.e., not really news.
Because he is about to get slapped down by SCOTUS.
Why doesn’t Derrick Watson go suck a bag of ........?
Never mind.
Quite frankly, even if the Supreme Court rules against Trump, he should just institute the ban.
Better yet, shut down all immigration.
Too much danger right now.
He has the Constitutional and statutory authority already. Too bad if the Courts can’t read.
Congress wants to fight Trump, have at it.
Can’t live in fear of the swamp denizens any longer.
If it is not this clear issue, it will be another.
The people are not going to fight a President who is trying to protect them.
The judge narrowed the injunction clearing the way for the administration to conduct internal reviews of other nation's vetting procedures for visa applicants while the case is being reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court, CNN reported.I recall all sorts of news reports that the case is moot because the administration should have been working on this all along. I knew all along those challenges were bogus, because I knew the Hawaii Court's order forbid the administration from studying the vetting details.
Let that sink in. The Court prohibited the administration from studying the vetting practices of foreign countries.
Obviously, that fact was not viewed as newsworthy by the press - which was out there criticizing the administration for having the order in the first place, and "this case should be moot if the administration did its job."
9th Circuit Court of Appeals their rulings are over turned 8 out of 10 times so much knowing about law oh wait liberals.
I agree.The Rats have ****ed up our immigration situation (on purpose) to the point where we don't have the first clue where we are...apart from the fact,of course,that we know we've got a very serious situation on our hands.
Stop *all* immigration for 10 years.Build the Wall.Repeal the "automatic citizenship at birth" policy,as has every other civilized nation (except Canada) over the last 20-30 years.Stop granting citizenship to *all* Green Card holders for 10 years.Pass a Constitutional Amendment stating that non-citizens don't enjoy all the Constitutional rights that citizens do.
And while we're doing all that we can be deporting the 30 million wetbacks currently living here.
The statutes give POTUS the authority to take the immigration action. How much more clearly in violation of statute can this injunction get?
I’m really wanting a SCOTUS smack-down here, but unfortunately we won’t get it.
So an appointed dick head of a judge can tell an elected President what he can and cannot do in an area that the President has full constitutional authority? BS!
In a "PERFECT" world, they'd be among the victims.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.