Skip to comments.
USS Fitzgerald Collision Update (Sailors found, bad news)
U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs ^
| 6/17/2017
| U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs
Posted on 06/17/2017 7:20:21 PM PDT by proust
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-266 next last
To: ealgeone
Mainstream media is being willfully obtuse...as usual.
41
posted on
06/17/2017 7:57:17 PM PDT
by
House Atreides
(Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
To: proust
Prayers for the families.
42
posted on
06/17/2017 7:59:37 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: Seruzawa
Even if the container ship was bought and paid for to run around like an idiot in the shipping lane, maybe even “have an accident” with an American military vessel, how did the Destroyer let herself get ran into?
43
posted on
06/17/2017 8:00:27 PM PDT
by
Delta 21
To: neodad
Thank you for that.
Very beautiful.
I’m an old Soldier but tonight my heart is with The United States Navy.
44
posted on
06/17/2017 8:01:15 PM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: proust
Eternal Father, strong to save,
Whose arm hath bound the restless wave,
Who bidd'st the mighty ocean deep
Its own appointed limits keep;
Oh, hear us when we cry to Thee,
For those in peril on the sea!
To: ladyjane
The problem is that we don’t know where on that track the collision actually happened.
If the collision happened at the start of the track (where the Crystal first veered SE), the track could be interpreted as the Crystal turning around to render aid. If the collision happened near the end (where the chronometer shows it came to a sudden stop before fleeing the scene) then it has a much more sinister interpretation.
There are unconfirmed reports that the Fitzgerald was stationary at the time, but without knowing the Fitzgerald’s own track (if any) and its position at the time of collision all we can do is speculate.
46
posted on
06/17/2017 8:02:19 PM PDT
by
Gideon7
To: stylin19a
It almost looks like maybe something or someone fell off the ship and they turned back to find it?
47
posted on
06/17/2017 8:03:14 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: proust
Hard to explain the unusual maneuvering of the container ship, but regardless, the Fitz should have been nimble and alert enough to avoid being broadsided.
48
posted on
06/17/2017 8:04:15 PM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: jacquej
Could it be a deliberate effort to take out one of our destroyers? Inquiring minds are definitely curious about this, and no longer trusts the MSM to report the truth.
Doesn't matter. If our state of the art fleet can't fend off a 29,000 ton (58 million pound) lumbering container ship, we should just discharge the sailors, sink the ships, and spend our money on something useful.
49
posted on
06/17/2017 8:04:55 PM PDT
by
867V309
(Lock Her Up)
To: blueunicorn6
Praying they died on impact.
50
posted on
06/17/2017 8:05:22 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Fungi
Ship handling requires constant vigilance. There are more questions than answers at this point. Helmsman freeze. Not all officers are competent in all situations.
51
posted on
06/17/2017 8:05:24 PM PDT
by
meatloaf
To: House Atreides; MagUSNRET
....Crikey, if true, why would it have performed those maneuvers...
An attack?
52
posted on
06/17/2017 8:06:29 PM PDT
by
Sasparilla
( I'm Not tired of Winning.)
To: proust
I assumed the first 90* change of course was where the collision occurred.
Then the almost 180* change was to assist rescue.
When other shipping arrived Crystal resumed track to Tokyo.
Lots of speculation.
I haven’t seen Fitzgerald’s course.
Had she lost power?
ETC
Port ship gives way...
Did Crystal slow before impact? Or is damage sustained by Fitzgerald consistent with cruising knottage?
53
posted on
06/17/2017 8:06:47 PM PDT
by
aumrl
(let's keep it real Conservatives)
To: Fungi
Agreed. An advanced US destroyer, one would think, would have the ability to know a 60,000 ton container ship, fully loaded and with the biggest radar profile of anything around, was bearing down
54
posted on
06/17/2017 8:07:03 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Gideon7
Gideon 7;
wish I had read your post before I entered mine.
55
posted on
06/17/2017 8:09:52 PM PDT
by
aumrl
(let's keep it real Conservatives)
To: proust
56
posted on
06/17/2017 8:11:55 PM PDT
by
Mercat
(Everytime an old man farts, a butterfly dies.)
To: ladyjane
Philippines.....odd maneuvers....just saying....too much stuff and unexplained actions....never ever trust the media.
57
posted on
06/17/2017 8:12:30 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
To: Fungi
>With all the technology navy ships have, how can this happen?
Incompetence at any level can be deadly.
58
posted on
06/17/2017 8:17:24 PM PDT
by
soycd
To: Fungi
With all the technology navy ships have, how can this happen? Somebody on the bridge was playing grab ass when they should have been working. What were the lookouts doing - sleeping?
59
posted on
06/17/2017 8:18:50 PM PDT
by
atc23
(The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
To: atc23
So far, yours is the best “excuse.” Something is awry here.
60
posted on
06/17/2017 8:23:39 PM PDT
by
Fungi
(Mucor roxii is not a rock band.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-266 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson