Skip to comments.
Sarah Palin Considering Libel Lawsuit Against New York Times
Townhall ^
| Cortney O'Brien
Posted on 06/15/2017 8:11:21 PM PDT by Kevin in California
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
No Sarah- don't consider......DO IT!
Sue the crap out of these rotten bastards.
To: Kevin in California
I wouldn’t mind other things being done to these mother ###ers.
2
posted on
06/15/2017 8:14:44 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(The only thing an upper crust Conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: Kevin in California
3
posted on
06/15/2017 8:15:30 PM PDT
by
Fungi
(Mucor roxii is not a rock band.)
To: Kevin in California; flaglady47; Maine Mariner; pax_et_bonum; Bob Ireland; Freedom56v2; ...
Because she's a public figure, she has to prove malice aforethought in a suit....which ought to be a slam-dunk seeing it's the New York Slimes!
Leni
4
posted on
06/15/2017 8:16:17 PM PDT
by
MinuteGal
(GO TRUMP !!!.....GO PENCE !!!.....GO USA !!!)
To: Kevin in California
5
posted on
06/15/2017 8:19:08 PM PDT
by
lightman
(Trump = A glorious amalgamation of Andrew Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan!)
To: Kevin in California
6
posted on
06/15/2017 8:20:23 PM PDT
by
manc
( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
To: Kevin in California
Do it! The Slimes must learn that there are consequences for their lies. Without it, they will just continue as usual.
7
posted on
06/15/2017 8:21:45 PM PDT
by
brewcrew1965
(Liberalism is a mental disorder.)
To: Kevin in California
8
posted on
06/15/2017 8:23:18 PM PDT
by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: Kevin in California
Absolutely do it, Sarah. The failing NYT can be yours if you get the right lawyer.
9
posted on
06/15/2017 8:30:21 PM PDT
by
txrefugee
To: Kevin in California
But they buy ink by the barrel.
10
posted on
06/15/2017 8:30:44 PM PDT
by
Lisbon1940
(No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
To: manc
“Do it”
I’d suggest a nice round sum like 100 Billion dollars. Give the Slimes the full Hulkster treatment.
To: Kevin in California
She used surveyor points. She didn’t use gun targets. I pointed this out way back in 2010.
To: brewcrew1965
Without it, they will just continue as usual.
= = = = = = = =
I don’t think it matters to them one way or the other.
Katy Couric - her staff - obviously tampered with a tape regarding guns etc that made the participants looking like fools when asked a ‘simple’ question but a pause (Rosemary Woods anyone) made it look like they were imbeciles.
VCDL had it thrown out by the judge...it is being appealed....
You can ‘sue them’ all you want but the only one making any ‘money’ is the lawyers once the ‘system’ can get the trials strung out.
As to suits in general, it ought to be set that in most cases the Lawyers get nothing unless the case is won.
There would be fewer frivolous suits if the shysters weren’t allowed to build up the hours THEN tell you the case is impossible.
13
posted on
06/15/2017 8:41:44 PM PDT
by
xrmusn
((6/98)"Ask the experienced rather than the learned")
To: Kevin in California
The pack of lies they constantly spread will not be stopped unless it starts costing a lot of money.
She has to take them to court .
They keep doing it because they make money spreading lies .
Conservative have to hold them accountable for it and they need to start taking them to court .
14
posted on
06/15/2017 8:41:52 PM PDT
by
Lera
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
>>>She used surveyor points. She didnt use gun targets<<< You mean сюрвейер очки. EVERYTHING is tied to the Russians nowadays.
15
posted on
06/15/2017 8:42:48 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
( Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
To: Lera
If it ever got to Trial, does anyone think a NYC Jury would find in her favor?
Really? LOL
16
posted on
06/15/2017 8:44:06 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
( Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
To: Kevin in California
The NYT knew the story was false and printed it maliciously. All the elements.
17
posted on
06/15/2017 8:44:32 PM PDT
by
Titus-Maximus
(It doesn't matter who votes for whom, it only matters who counts the votes - Joe Stalin)
To: Kickass Conservative
Bullies don’t stop unless you fight back and it hurt
18
posted on
06/15/2017 8:48:24 PM PDT
by
Lera
To: Kevin in California
It seems to me that proving malice would be easy, but I am not a lawyer. There is absolutely no evidence that Republicans in general or Sarah Palin in particular had anything to do with motivating Jared Loughner to shoot Gabby Giffords. Loughner was insane, and he apparently had developed a personal dislike for Giffords.
Right wingers don't list the Communist Manifesto among their favorite books, or participate in American flag burning videos, as Loughner did. Loughner was no conservative.
Let's near the NYT attorneys defend the laughable notion that Sarah Palin's map motivated Loughner, when there is no evidence that he ever saw it, or that ANYONE would be motivated to shoot a politician because of X marks on a damn map.
19
posted on
06/15/2017 8:48:34 PM PDT
by
TChad
To: Lera
>>>Bullies dont stop unless you fight back and it hurt<<<
That’s just it, Justice against the Bullies has nothing to do with it, which was my point.
The Bullies will win this one unless there is a change of Venue.
20
posted on
06/15/2017 8:54:48 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
( Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson