Posted on 06/14/2017 9:49:21 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
KCK Executive Council Co-chair Besê Hozat stressed that the control over Raqqa will be significant for Syria in general as well, and stated that ISIS will receive the lethal blow in Raqqa.
KCK (Kurdistan Communities Union) Executive Council Co-chair Besê Hozat spoke about the latest developments in Raqqa to the News Channel TV.
Hozat stated that the just-launched Raqqa operation created intense conflict and squabbles among the international and regional powers and said: The strategic location of Raqqa makes it strategic for the future of Syria. The war is at Raqqas door, and the conflicts and rivalries increased. There is a serious conflict with the SDF. Russias statements on the SDF are connected to these manipulations and the conflict.
WHOEVER CONTROLS RAQQA WILL CONTROL SYRIA
Hozat also commented on NATOs decision to enter the coalition and said: They wanted to make NATO more functional, to restructure NATO, to make it more visible and influential, this pursuit and this tendency are part of the reason why NATO entered the Coalition.
Besê Hozat spoke of the strategic location of Raqqa and made the following comments:
Raqqa has great strategic significance for the future of Syria. The war coming to Raqqa and this much increase in the conflicts and squabbles is connected to that fact. Whoever controls Raqqa will, in a way, have more control over Syria. That force will have a more influential, definitive role in shaping Syria. Raqqa is also the ISIS capital, and this will mean a lethal blow to ISIS in the region. SDF control increasing in these areas, democratic forces gaining more control in this area will mean that a democratic system will take shape in Syria. It is a key location. That is why the war is now at Raqqas gate. If you noticed, squabbles and clashes are on the rise. There are serious conflicts between the US and Russia, Iran and the US, the regime and foreign forces and the SDF. Russias recent statements on the SDF claim they made a deal with ISIS. That is completely and utterly removed from the truth, it has zero connection to it. As we have seen, Raqqa is under siege. ISIS doesnt have a line to put out convoys. All roads have been surrounded and blocked. There may be some spots for civilians, we dont know that, the people in the field will know that better. But these operations on perception are connected to the existing conflict. They are deliberate. They are due to the significance of Raqqa, and they may increase.
NATOS DECISION
Hozat said the following on NATOs decision to join the war in Syria alongside the Coalition Forces:
NATOs situation is a discussion in itself. If you remember, during the US election process Trump made some comments, he said NATO lost its function, we must restructure it. He started a discussion in NATO. With World War III, NATO is seriously on the agenda again. NATO, UN, EU, the current system is severely blocked. These structures have regained significance with the World War III. They are on the agenda much more. But the agenda Trump started is not just random. I believe the global system is discussing NATO and the restructuring of NATO. I dont think NATO joining the Coalition is entirely separate from this agenda and this pursuit to make NATO more functional, restructured, visible and influential. NATO entered the Coalition as a result of these pursuits and tendencies. They took this step as a result of discussions to increase its function and its mission and restructure NATO.
And now the balance of the world has changed. NATO was formed against the Soviet Union. There was a socialist revolution in the Soviets, that was seen as a threat. Then in the 89-90 period, real socialism failed. Russia now has a capitalist system, the country has become a part of the capitalist system. Real socialism failed everywhere else in the world as well. Right now, the Kurds and the revolutionary democratic forces in the region are leading the democratic socialist struggle. This structure of ISIS emerged in the region, completely outside the dynamics of the region, entirely different, and posing a serious threat to the world, to humanity and to peoples as well. That was a product of the capitalist system. With the green belt, these people were among those organized against the Soviet Union and now it has come to this. Al Qaeda changed and transformed and became who they are now. And this tendency is increasingly common in the region, and can find a social base. Not just in the region, in Central Asia, in Europe, among Islamic circles, among Muslims. Now the situation is different. And, the nation state systems in the region are dissolving. The 20th century status quo in the region is dissolving. Nation state systems, the balance those bring, 20th century alliances and the political balance are dissolving. When NATO was founded, the nation states system had only just started in the region, and now they are dissolving. NATO was, in a way, founded as an army for the nation state systems, as a defense force. Restructuring NATO is on the agenda. This will be clearer in the coming years. With intense discussions and meetings, this issue will intensify. But I believe this is a result of these tendencies and these pursuits. It might come to restructuring NATO strictly for the region, focusing on the region. A new structuring process may start that includes many Islamic states, regional states and forces.
Now the elements are changing, with NATO entry into this conflict.
Multi national interest in the outcome of this. Syria (Assad), Turkey, Iran, Kurds, SA, Qatar, Israel, Iraq; all are affected by the outcome. The US is also in the list, but actually more for interests of allies in the Middle East.
None of the future is at this point a given. God Bless those who are ending ISIS and may a peaceful resolution to this be possible.
For years Obama was helpless against ISIS and a case can be made he helped facilitate ISIS.
Here we are not even 6 months into the Trump administration and they are nearly at their end as an army. You’ll never hear this achievement reported.
ISIS remains a threat for small attacks from small groups and lone actors.
Obama could have ended ISIS any time he wanted. And he did not want to.
There is some speculation as to the degree of Obama’s involvement in creating ISIS, but now doubt he enabled it.
His ties to the Muslim Brotherhood are the key. And they are still strong in Turkey and Qatar.
It is no wonder that Trump has had such success, but it was dependent upon supporting the Syrian Kurds. Otherwise this would have gone on forever. Syrian Kurds must be given credit for fighting for survival and for freedom.
This has been a fruitful joint effort. It would have been very difficult for Kurds to have done this without help. But they have done a remarkable job. Even the unspecified job of unifying many dissimilar groups. All of the SDF want a better future.
Syria Ping
WHOEVER CONTROLS RAQQA WILL CONTROL SYRIA
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Not sure I’d say that too loudly...particularly, within figurative ear shot of the Spetznaz
They know it is true. The wild cards are Iran and Turkey. If they were not, this could be a negotiated settlement with US and Russia playing mediator.
I do not expect it to be that simple.
Point taken. I am no defender of Socialism. I know the outcome, no matter how good the intentions.
I do believe Raqqa will very badly cripple ISIS. And it will have wide ranging consequences for them.
One more piece of Obama’s legacy gone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.