Posted on 06/12/2017 10:44:19 PM PDT by Lera
Smirnoff Vodka has taken trolling to a whole new level in an ad mocking the alleged Trump-Russia controversy.
Former FBI Director James Comey testified in a hearing last week that President Trump was not personally under investigation for collusion with Russia, totally destroying the MSM narrative that many leftists had hoped would lead to the destruction of the current administration.
(Excerpt) Read more at allenbwest.com ...
The ad is kinda dorky and harmless. Certainly not malicious. I love the Russians... home to the best classical composers ever.
There are bigger fish to fry that no one seems to care about.
The malicious MSM is largely owned by the following 4 corporations: Disney, Comcast, Time Warner, CBS. Which conservative pundits discuss this unseemly connection? None that I know of. Which conservative activists rant about Big Media? None that I know of. Which radio jocks “speak truth to power” regarding this ongoing vertical assault against conservatives and now POTUS? None that I know of. Any FReepers???
Don’t go after capitalism when it’s simply attempting to be clever. Get some real conviction and stop patronizing the major corporations that are pissing in your shoes.
On a related note, I’m curious about CNN’s recent however sparse concerns for objectivity. Naturally, I have my suspicions...
- - - -
Trump’s pick to lead antitrust division raises concerns over vertical mergers
BY HARPER NEIDIG - 05/30/17 11:41 AM EDT
President Trumps nominee to run the Department of Justices antitrust division said that vertical mergers, such as the proposed AT&T-Time Warner deal, can raise competitive concerns.
67! Man I feel old now. Was he as good as he was was when he was 27? I bet he was.
See pot #9
Smirnoff is owned by Brit company Diageo.
They own dozens of brands, including vodkas Ketel One and Popov. Johnny Walker, Crown Royal, Seagram’s Seven and Captain Morgan are among many other of their brands.
Likely this was an ad agency with too much leeway from a big corporation.
Vodka is of course for adults, and the issue concerns an ad. On the other hand, Target’s policies, as I understand, subjected children to greater predatory risks. So Target did indeed deserve to be TARGETED.
Merinoff family fortune is from being part of a New York State licensed liquor distribution cartel (monopoly) in New York City. They don’t have any obvious specific connection to the Smirnoff brand.
ANYONE that takes shots at Trump is getting targeted.
It is not in good jest as it may have been done with obama.
It is with GLEE at watching him being taken down.
So Smirnoff can go #### themselves.
It’s not a lot of steps to reach to conclude Smirnoff will do MUCH more damage to kids than Target, as it is one more push towards Trump impeachment.
Sounds silly now? Wait and see.
Thanks.
That's as I suspected, namely, no connection other than handling the Smirnoff product.
>> So Smirnoff can go #### themselves.
What about Disney, Comcast, and Time Warner? Never hear jack from anyone about these corporations and the vertical malice they’re waging against us and the President.
In post #21 above, I referenced the AT&T/Time Warner deal. Time Warner owns CNN.
Not to ignore the venomous pawns, but the Guns of Navarone are inflicting the greatest damage, and that can be stopped through denial of patronage. I’m a happy Verizon customer. So Comcast and AT&T won’t be pissing in my shoes. And we’re no longer visiting Disney properties. And ESPN is certainly banned in our household.
BTW, I’m a single malt guy.
I agree. I think it’s a good ad (gets views and chatter) and is indeed funny.
From the Author's Note:
This historical narrative account is based on exhaustive research conducted over more than four years in the United States and Russia. Information included in the book was gleaned from over 500 archival documents, approximately 250 articles from periodicals and newspapers, more than 900 books, and interviews with a dozen or more leading experts in related fields. In some instances, primary sources could not be found at all, were incomplete, or in conflict with other sources. In these cases, available documentation and relevant historical context were relied upon to provide likely accounts of events. In other circumstances, corroborating evidence supporting personal recollections or viewpoints could not be found. For example, some of Vladimir Smirnov’s many remembrances, recorded by his third wife, could not be verified. Notations have been included throughout the book to alert readers to these occasions wherever possible.
From page 2 (of ten):
It was the second day of December, and this eloquent tribute was not for a tsar or a high-ranking minister or a military chief. The man inside the long oak box was Pyotr Arsenievich Smirnov, arguably the most famous vodka maker in the world.That such a spectacle would be held for a man like Smirnov would have been unthinkable in 1831 when he was born at the family home in Kayurovo, a small farming village roughly 170 miles due north from Moscow. His parents were poor, barely literate, and most telling, they were serfs, part of Russia’s legally bound underclass. They were essentially slaves, owned by the proprietors of the land on which they lived and worked. All that they earned was shared with their landowners, who had control over what they did, where they went, and how they survived.
This commoner background, in tandem with Smirnov’s ultimate notoriety as a leading purveyor of liquors, was not a life that typically beat a path to prominence. Moreover, for the last decade of his life, alcoholism was raging throughout society and calls for increased controls on spirits producers were rampant. Still, when Smirnov died at age sixty-seven of heart failure, newspapers treated the event as a national tragedy. Descriptions like “distinguished,” “exemplary,” and “a giant of Russian industry” appeared in news stories. Smirnov’s passing shared the front page with the weightiest developments of the day—from the United States’s intention to sell the Philippines, to the controversial and scandalous Dreyfus Affair. Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish artillery officer was serving time on Devil’s Island for allegedly passing military secrets to Germany. But supporters, including writer Émile Zola who published his renowned J’accuse letter, successfully proved that anti-Semites had framed Dreyfus. Ten months after Smirnov’s death, Dreyfus was pardoned, later becoming a knight in the French Legion of Honor.
GIN AND TONIC, please.
I boycott all alcohol already, and have for 20 years or so now. 8>)
Okay, adding them to the list, which already contains Absolut.
Well, I ain’t seen my baby since I don’t know when....
I love George Thorogood.
I believe they are mocking the democrats
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.