Yeah, I don’t get it either. I may be missing something here, but it seems to be a legitimate question. Why would he go out in public - twice! - to announce the closing of the investigation and then the re-opening of the investigation wrt Hillary but not go out and say Trump is not the target of any current investigation?
And Comey’s excuse that “he may have to correct the record” doesn’t hold water either. He had no problem correcting the record several times wrt Hillary. There is nothing wrong with saying something like “at this time Trump is not being investigated”. If something came up later he could easily ‘correct the record’ by stating the new evidence. And yet, even after all of this, it all seems to be way outside protocol and outside the chain of command. FBI brings the evidence, not the charges. He can really only state what is being investigated and what is being referred to the AG. He is not supposed to be the witness and the judge by usurping the role of the AG.
Comey is clever like a fox. I suspect he is in league with Schumer or others on the left, pretending to be honest Abe and not in anyone’s camp. I just don’t trust the guy after watching him today. I get a funny feeling with all of these “I may be wrong” pronouncements. They were all fake in my opinion.
Something is wrong with this entire Russian business. It may be so, but I have not heard of anything concrete describing their operations. It is claimed they hacked into DNC, but DNC refused to allow the FBI to check it out. The Dems lie so much I wonder if that is true or not. The Russians tried to hack the RNC but couldn’t get in. And the cyber nerds tell me it is possible for someone to hack you but leave the fingerprint of someone else. That cyber stuff is out of my league. But what, actually, did the Russians do?? No guessing, just tell be in layman terms so I can understand. What did the Russians do?
Agreed - that is what I understand