His blood was at the scene, knife cut on his finger, multiple threats made, and the gloves that actually did fit and his DNA, her DNA, and Goldmans DNA. Overwhelming evidence but the Africans on the stacked jury didn’t believe it either.
You don’t need to retry the case with me. He was found not guilty by a jury of his peers. Your pointing out the race of the jurors, and the verbage you used is duly noted (I guess you felt it was going to cross the line to use the n-word?). The funny thing is, you have probably voted for politicians who support the welfare state (the reason the black family unit has been destroyed) and illegal immigration (which restricts employment opportunities for poor Americans).
There were numerous mistakes made, some of which led to reasonable doubt. I wouldn't have voted "guilty"if I was on that jury.
For instance, one reason that OJ's blood might have been at the scene was the fact that Detective Van Adder had a sample of OJ's blood in his pocket, and proceeded to bring it to the crime scene! That's just asinine!
There was also a willful misrepresentation (perjury) on the affidavit for the search warrant.
Not to mention that the glove DIDN'T fit, and the whole jury saw the dramatic demonstration.
You can argue that the prosecution botched the case, but to blame it on black jurors is ludicrous...