Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Expedites Trump’s Petition on Executive Order Case
Breitbart ^ | June 3, 2017 | by Ken Klukowski

Posted on 06/03/2017 11:16:18 AM PDT by COUNTrecount

WASHINGTON, D.C.—The Supreme Court took the rare step on Friday of expediting consideration of a major case, rapidly accelerating the schedule for reviewing the Fourth Circuit’s blocking of President Donald Trump’s travel ban executive order.

President Trump issued Executive Order 13780 (EO) on March 6, Section 2(c) of which temporarily restricted travel from six Muslim-majority countries associated with terrorism while the United States developed new vetting procedures to keep the nation safe.

Immigration activists sued, along with several immigrants and their families. A liberal federal district judge in Maryland granted a preliminary injunction blocking Section 2(c) of the EO. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit then affirmed the trial court’s injunction in a 10-3 decision, ruling that the EO violated the Constitution’s Establishment Clause, and taking the almost unheard-of step of all the court’s judges hearing the case, instead of sending it to a three-judge panel.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a petition for review at the Supreme Court on Thursday. Under the Court’s rules, a response from the plaintiffs would be due July 3. By that time the Court would be on recess for the summer, meaning that the justices would vote at the Court’s annual pre-Term conference, which will take place on September 25, on whether to take the case. That would typically mean hearing arguments in December or January, with a final decision coming down in early or mid-2018.

Acting Solicitor General Jeff Wall at DOJ also asked Chief Justice John Roberts (who supervises the Fourth Circuit) to stay the appellate court’s decision until the justices can decide the matter.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; eo13780; scotus; trumptravelban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

1 posted on 06/03/2017 11:16:18 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

A winning smackdown is coming...


2 posted on 06/03/2017 11:17:09 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

keep calm :)

I hope, but with SCOTUS you just never know.


3 posted on 06/03/2017 11:18:19 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

“...final decision coming down in early or mid-2018.”

Wow, if that’s “expediting,” I’d hate to see what the slow road is.....


4 posted on 06/03/2017 11:22:18 AM PDT by AnalogReigns (Real life is ANALOG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Obola is going to be so pissed he will send out thousands of #BlackLiesMatter Soros’ mercenaries to start their jihad.


5 posted on 06/03/2017 11:23:49 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Some people consider government to be a necessary evil, others their personal Ponzi scheme.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

Yeah that’s the SC schedule but I wonder if Roberts will sign a stay?
That’s the big question right now.

Is he compromised and it won’t happen?


6 posted on 06/03/2017 11:23:59 AM PDT by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

SMACKDOWN IMMINENT:

The lower courts never even had jurisdiction.

This ONLY belonged in front of the SCOTUS.


7 posted on 06/03/2017 11:25:05 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I hope the Judge rule on what the law says the President can legally do verses what words one has said........as they have been ruling on his words and that seems so out of bounds...


8 posted on 06/03/2017 11:25:26 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I had a feeling this would get fast tracked. :-)


9 posted on 06/03/2017 11:26:00 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

We will see if the Constitution and the Rule of Law means anything with this Ruling.

Anything less than a Unanimous slap down of the Lower Courts will tell the tale.


10 posted on 06/03/2017 11:29:03 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Islamiphobia is a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons.” Christopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

hopefully this is really good news.


11 posted on 06/03/2017 11:29:21 AM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

No kidding. Slow-walk must = ‘when cars fly’.


12 posted on 06/03/2017 11:32:34 AM PDT by txhurl (Time to blow the Queen and King off the board, DJT, and by your birthday, or on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
Wow, if that’s “expediting,” I’d hate to see what the slow road is.....

That would be the normal schedule. The expedited schedule means a decision could happen by October. The excerpt above doesn't make it clear but it's in the article.

13 posted on 06/03/2017 11:33:45 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

Thanks for the clarification. :)


14 posted on 06/03/2017 11:35:52 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Sounds like it’s John (it’s a tax) Roberts decision whether to grant stay.


15 posted on 06/03/2017 11:37:22 AM PDT by rainee (Her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
We always seem to be on the short end of the stick. Really would be surprised if this Country can survive with the slow action of life matters. America is so full of bull shi! government types that we cannot succeed. This is so important that the SC should take it up tomorrow, but instead these useless pieces of junk will let America hurt.
16 posted on 06/03/2017 11:40:34 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

First litmus test for Gorsuch.
BTW, he just said at an event at Harward that he did NOT share a cynical view on government!!! Yikes!!!
He was joined by Stephen Breyer for that program.

It was also a little unsettling to see him being so jovial with Breyer and Sotomayor during the recent SCOTUS photo shoot.


17 posted on 06/03/2017 11:43:08 AM PDT by edie1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
SMACKDOWN IMMINENT:

The lower courts never even had jurisdiction.

This ONLY belonged in front of the SCOTUS.

As I understand it, there is a statute giving the President the authority to do what he did and at the same time denying the Supreme Court jurisdiction. The Constitution gives Congress the right to determine the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, so the plaintiff in this case has to argue that the President is doing something the Constitution doesn't allow Congress to authorize him to do. That's why they are making this crazy religious discrimination argument

18 posted on 06/03/2017 11:43:22 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount; All
Our Constitution does not apply for those not yet within our jurisdiction. POTUS ability to bar anyone from entering the USA is valid.

If any individual believes they are barred wrongfully, let THEM sue, or apply, for entrance to USA - SIMPLE.

19 posted on 06/03/2017 11:44:21 AM PDT by 1_Of_We
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edie1960

Ooops. Meant to spell Harvard. Sorry!


20 posted on 06/03/2017 11:45:38 AM PDT by edie1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson