Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Direct Collision’: U.S. Successfully Destroys a Missile in Flight
cnsnews.com ^ | 5/30/2017 | Patrick Goodenough

Posted on 05/31/2017 7:17:48 AM PDT by rktman

In a “critical milestone” for the program to provide a missile defense umbrella over the U.S. homeland, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency on Tuesday reported the first successful interception and destruction in flight of a target with ICBM characteristics.

A ground-based interceptor launched from the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California collided with and destroyed an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM)-class projectile that had been launched from at atoll in the Marshall Islands, more than 4,500 miles away, the MDA reported.

Tuesday’s was the 18th text since October 1999, and the tenth to have been declared successful. Three of the eight failures were ascribed to the kill vehicle failing to separate from the booster rocket, while another three also related to kill vehicle performance.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: defense; missiledefense; trumpdod; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Notice last paragraph? 10 for 18 ain't quite gonna cut it guys. Were the failures early on? Guess there were some lean years in development money huh?
1 posted on 05/31/2017 7:17:48 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

Is it bad that I read the headline as “direct collusion” instead of collusion?


2 posted on 05/31/2017 7:24:54 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Skin-to-skin kill with zero CEP is very nice. As for the marginal overall success ratio, that is not unusual in program development. What matters is the success ratio once the bugs are worked out. Even the Trident D-5 was not perfect at first. Engineering changes tend to reduce or eliminate failure modes over time.

North Korea will never be able to afford a flood of missiles. Do they really want to risk launching two or even ten missiles at the USA, knowing that between their failures and our defenses they might score no hits at all?

3 posted on 05/31/2017 7:27:05 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Read it again. It’s COLLISION!


4 posted on 05/31/2017 7:28:03 AM PDT by Tucker39 (Known as the Father of modern agriculture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Read it again. It’s COLLISION!


5 posted on 05/31/2017 7:28:04 AM PDT by Tucker39 (Known as the Father of modern agriculture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The Patriot missile system would typically miss more than hit its targets, but it was better than nothing. The only reason Obama cancelled its deployment in Europe is because he thought it was “sour relations with Russia”. A purely defensive missile was seen as being too aggressive.


6 posted on 05/31/2017 7:31:23 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

How many missiles does North Korea have to fire to get a 99% probability of hitting Guam? If all they have to worry about is the reliability of their rockets they might need to fire say 2 or 3 of their scarce missiles. If every missile they fire has a 50% chance of being shot down, how many do they now need to fire? My poor statistics say 15 to 20.
It promotes deterrence by making the job of the attack planner much more difficult even when it is not close to perfect.


7 posted on 05/31/2017 7:34:12 AM PDT by conejo99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

A message test. We have a lot of enemies. This will have to get by the infantile stage.


8 posted on 05/31/2017 7:34:15 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder
"...A purely defensive missile was seen as being too aggressive."....a sentence that fits Obama to a "T".
9 posted on 05/31/2017 7:38:33 AM PDT by yoe (Keep focused Freepers andspeak out for POTUS ... investigate Maxine Waters, Ilijah Cummings, Nancy P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Imagine how far,we’d be if they hadn’t slashed funding for much of SDI. I was able to to play a small role back in the 80s and even early 90s. And I would leave my job tomorrow to go back to it if they’re funding and hiring. In a New York second..


10 posted on 05/31/2017 7:52:58 AM PDT by SueRae (An administration like no other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“10 for 18 ain’t quite gonna cut it guys. “

They are One for One on ballistic missile interceptions.


11 posted on 05/31/2017 8:02:19 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

New York? Lol!


12 posted on 05/31/2017 8:03:29 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conejo99

“It promotes deterrence by making the job of the attack planner much more difficult even when it is not close to perfect.”

How many ‘defense’ missiles are available to protect Guam?

How would you identify and prioritize the NK nuclear vs. conventional warheads?


13 posted on 05/31/2017 8:05:11 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Was that a photoshop, or “white knuckles below” time?


14 posted on 05/31/2017 8:20:18 AM PDT by GladesGuru (Islam Delenda Est. Because of what Islam is - and because of what Muslims do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

You learn more from failures than you do from successes.


15 posted on 05/31/2017 8:25:34 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
"Ideas have consequences." - Weaver

Consider: for decades, America's founding idea of freedom for individuals in the society and limitation on individuals in positions of power in government have been challenged by so-called "progressive" notions of a reversal of that Constitutional formula for liberty.

A great "battle of ideas" has been occurring, sometimes unnoticed by many, for decades!!

Now is the time to launch a massive "defense umbrella" of rediscovery of the ideas of liberty to expose and destroy the Progressive ideas which threaten to extinguish the beacon of liberty which has brought millions of oppressed persons to America for hundreds of years.

This is the moment! Now is the time!

Thomas Jefferson, only days before his death on July 4, 1826, explaining his inability to attend a gathering to celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Declaration, wrote to Roger Weightman:

" I should, indeed, with peculiar delight, have met and exchanged there congratulations personally with the small band, the remnant of that host of worthies, who joined with us on that day, in the bold and doubtful election we were to make for our country, between submission or the sword; and to have enjoyed with them the consolatory fact, that our fellow citizens, after half a century of experience and prosperity, continue to approve the choice we made. may it be to the world, what I believe it will be, (to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all) the Signal of arousing men to burst the chains, under which monkish ignorance and superstition had persuaded them to bind themselves, and to assume the blessings & security of self-government. That form which we have substituted, restores the free right to the unbounded exercise of reason and freedom of opinion. All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. the general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view. the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately, by the grace of god. These are grounds of hope for others. for ourselves, let the annual return of this day forever refresh our recollections of these rights, and an undiminished devotion to them."(Jefferson, June 24, 1826, to Roger Weightman, End of Jefferson quotation)

16 posted on 05/31/2017 8:48:44 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

One would think I should have learned a lot by now. Lol!


17 posted on 05/31/2017 8:49:33 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Years ago there was a proposal to arm ICBMs with kinetic kill weapons, tungsten arts that wouldlam into their targets with meteorite like velocities. This would seem to be the ideal weapon the use in retaliation for any North Korean attack on the US


18 posted on 05/31/2017 9:03:25 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcherhttp://www.stone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
You learn more from failures than you do from successes.

A lesson learned during WW2 when they realized that 'adding armor to the sides of airplanes because so many of the ones that returned to base were all shot up' wasn't the right approach. They figured out that if they returned to base at all, the number of holes in the sides wasn't the problem - so they reasoned that armoring the engines would increase survivability.

19 posted on 05/31/2017 9:13:41 AM PDT by Quality_Not_Quantity (I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

Very real, and very hazardous for the crew below. This problem, caused by the ignition shock near the ocean surface was so serious that the program was stopped until an engineering task team could resolve it.

Lots of Lockheed people were involved in this and in a few more launches a major solution was developed.


20 posted on 05/31/2017 9:22:13 AM PDT by KC_for_Freedom (California engineer (ret) and ex-teacher (ret) now part time Professor (what do you know?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson