Skip to comments.28 MAY 2017: END OF A NIGHTMARE: SHIP CARRYING 1,500 MIGRANTS PULLS INTO A MEDITERRANEAN PORT AFTER
Posted on 05/29/2017 8:41:40 PM PDT by TigerClaws
click here to read article
Excellent points. Do you mind if I share?
Yes, Libya was a key move in this organised campaign. Syria is another front of the same war, and the only place where some of the strategy has met with resistance.
I just do not understand why Italy is allowing this to be done to their country.
"The Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed II, ordered Vlad to pay homage to him personally, but Vlad had the sultan's two envoys captured and impaled. In February 1462, he broke into Ottoman territory, massacring tens of thousands of Turks and Bulgarians. Mehmed launched a campaign against Wallachia to replace Vlad with Vlad's younger brother, Radu. Vlad attempted to capture the sultan at Târgovişte during the night of 1617 June 1462. The sultan and the main Ottoman army left Wallachia,"
That was my first thought, too.
Why was the ship not impounded and sold for scrap?
Why was the captain and crew not arrested?
Why were the illegal immigrants not arrested and immediately deported?
These are the real questions we must ask.
And who financed the ship?
Why are the assets of the organization that financed the ship not frozen and impounded?
Why are the people that financed that organization not investigated?
Come on people!! We must get tough! It is not rocket science.
Are you talking about yourself? Because I'm well-versed in history.
AFRICA WAS NOT CARVED UP IN 1914. it took place at the end of the PREVIOUS century.
Notice the map says 1914. It doesn't say "Late 1800s."
Dude where the hell are you citing this?
This is common historical knowledge. Europe at the time feared getting overrun by Africa's population. That is primarily the reason why they intervened and colonized the continent. Their objective was to modernize the continent and bring some semblance of civilization to the people, so "there" doesn't come "here" and then "here" becomes "there."
Outside of Britain and maybe France, not one European power was remotely interested in doing anything other than what I cited above.
You mean they were just interested in getting the natural resources and plundering the continent? All that would have accomplished was resentment by the people and the rise of tin-pot dictators and warlords (Yes, they came later, but were created by globalists who didn't want Africa to stand on it's own).
You honestly have no idea what you are talking about on this. There isnt one source of quote that affirms your thesis even slightly.
If Europe hadn't done what it did in 1914 and before that, Africa would have truly been teeming with desperate refugees trying to get into Europe.
Never in my wildest dreams did I imagine Western Civilization in Europe would die in this manner.
Post Christian secular west.
Non breeding population, sexual degeneracy.
Certain groups want to ‘brown out’ the population to dumb them down and keep them malleable.
It’s an invasion via immigration. Same thing is happening to the United States as well. The 11 million illegals might be 30-40 million according to A.Colter’s book on the subject.
Collective suicide is what it is.
Once the white Europeans are gone, it’ll be the same hell hole we see today in Africa across the European continent.
The Eastern European countries are the last hope for Western civilization. Which is exactly why the global elites want us at odds with Russia.
This is right out of Raspail’s novel The Camp of the Saints.
They won’t be able to say that they weren’t warned.
This is almost embarassing to witness.
You show me a map of Africa in 1914....and conclude that it was carved up in 1914 (somehow taking place while the Europeans were about to go to war with each other), and have the nerve to say “This is common historical knowledge. Europe at the time feared getting overrun by Africa’s population”.
Again, can you CITE A SOURCE for any of this?
“You mean they were just interested in getting the natural resources and plundering the continent? All that would have accomplished was resentment by the people “
Here. Just start here for the actual story of post 1860 European colonization in Africa, and I’ll also recommend you just get some physical books on this topic.
Note the year 1884, NOT 1914.
75% of the occupants of the ship were adult males... So much for the bs “women and children” lies.
Well the muslim invaders will face European and American ingenuity , strategy , and intelligence when the fight comes. They are dumb as rocks, well win.
Like Afghanistan, and Iraq?
Go ahead and underestimate them. 15 years on, and they are still getting their licks in on the west, and Europe is in full retreat.
There’s one more piece of the puzzle: the will to win. When we have the will to win, we can defeat ANY adversary. (See, e.g., World War II.) If we really wanted to repel the Muslim invaders, and had the will to do so, whatever it took, the “war” would be over in a week. And the survivors on their side would be so shell-shocked that they would cast off their demonic “religion” forever. (Again, see World War II, aftermath for Germany and Japan.)
When we don’t have the will to win, then all the ingenuity, strategy, and intelligence in the world won’t save us.
1500...A battalion just hit the beach in Italy.
In a sane world, the Italian navy would be patrolling off their shores. When they came upon one of those refugee ships, they would fire a warning shot across her bow. If the ship didn’t immediately turn around, the navy would sink her with shells and torpedoes, and then depart the area, leaving any survivors to their fate. Oh, and video cameras would record the entire thing, and the videos would be spread far and wide. Four or five such events would be enough to put a serious dent in the refugee traffic, not to mention the willingness of the ship owners to risk their vessels.
But because the first four words of my post don’t apply, the invasion continues unchecked.
Too bad it’s an Anzio!
Hmmm. Did you notice they wouldn't let the boat land until after the G7 summit was over, to protect the "world leaders"--the very architects of the invasion of illegals--from being too close to their "refugee" beneficiaries? Security for me, but not for thee.
Sometimes there's a kind of perfection about hypocrisy.
My first thoughts exactly. Held offshore for two (more) days of misery...to keep the "architects of the invasion of illegals" safe.
Later, for the residents who cannot jet off to wherever they like, maybe to the Bahama's for vacation (and touching base with off-shore bank accounts) and must stay put (or themselves immigrate to where, the U.S.? Australia? that takes money, if you are European white-race and must pay-pay your own way plus everybody else's way-way) the latest groaning boat-load on top of the thousands of other boatloads, no big deal.
will save us from;
And they will thank Europe for that rescue by raping and pillaging them . Oh lets not forget blowing them up too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.