Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USAA Claims to Avoid 'Opinion Shows,' But Here's Their Ad on the Wild 'Rachel Maddow Show'
Newsbusters ^ | 5/26/17 | Tim Graham

Posted on 05/26/2017 7:18:34 AM PDT by markomalley

The advertisers publicly bowing to the Left and pulling ads from Sean Hannity's Fox show aren't getting cheers from their customers. The message board at USAA looks like there's some unhappiness. Meanwhile, the proof keeps coming that despite their stated "policy" of not advertising on opinion shows, USAA has advertised on wild-eyed MSNBC programming speculating on how much Donald Trump is owned by Russian strongmen and oligarchs.

For example, our diggers found a USAA ad on MSNBC's The Rachel Maddow Show on May 2:

(video at link)

In March, Sonny Bunch was somehow allowed to blog at The Washington Post that Maddow's big embarrassing Geraldo-esque show on small slivers of Trump's tax information implied she dwells in conspiracy theories: "we weren’t watching a news broadcast so much as a modern recreation of X’s monologue from Oliver Stone’s JFK."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: busted
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Alberta's Child

I was never in the military, but I have a mutual fund account. They will not let me have any other kind of account since I am not military.

Also, I can only have one kind of mutual fund account and cannot pick, like those that are military or ex-military.


21 posted on 05/26/2017 10:02:06 AM PDT by packrat35 (Pelosi is only on loan to the world from Satan. Hopefully he will soon want his baby killer back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

Trust me. I visited facebook, and saw a woman I knew , and nearly every time she posted on her page , or to others she said to get the real, factual news is to watch Madcow.
I contacted her, and told her that it was all about her opinion, and she was biased. Holy crap, she went off at the deep end, and ranted how she is not bias bla bla.
I guess she has turned into a raving, liberal loon since I knew her years ago.


22 posted on 05/26/2017 10:08:15 AM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

USAA is nothing but a lousy and very expensive insurance company.

They once had a use but not any longer.

They were a military officers insurance group, but they have long outlived that usefulness.


23 posted on 05/26/2017 10:12:58 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

I saw the FB of a college gf and she had MadCow “liked” She was liberal and super cute back then, but now?

WOW, BFUghlee


24 posted on 05/26/2017 10:24:15 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat ("Liberalism is a mental disorder" On FULL Display NOW! BOYCOTT Mexico nba NFL PepsiCO Kellogg's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

” ... in 2008 they basically decided to widely open membership to former military, widows, divorced (but un-remarried) spouses,”

Divorced spouses, re-married or not, have been able to keep their USAA membership since at least the year 2000.


25 posted on 05/26/2017 11:17:14 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

“USAA is nothing but a lousy and very expensive insurance company.”

I must respectfully disagree. In my experience (+15 years), their customer service has been excellent and their insurance products (automobile and homeowners in my case) are competitively priced.


26 posted on 05/26/2017 11:20:35 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg
Divorced spouses, re-married or not, have been able to keep their USAA membership since at least the year 2000.

The operative word is keep. Now they can initially obtain...big difference.

27 posted on 05/26/2017 11:21:04 AM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“Divorced spouses, re-married or not, have been able to keep their USAA membership since at least the year 2000.”

‘The operative word is keep. Now they can initially obtain...big difference.”

Thanks for the clarification. Prior to 2000, divorced spouses were not allowed even to *keep* their USAA membership.


28 posted on 05/26/2017 11:29:59 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

That cuteness goes away when they opebn their liberal mouths.
My oldest boy is a Marine, and was based at Camp Pendleton last year when he met a beautiful looking woman on the beach.
He got talking , and went on a date that night.
The date lasted 30 minutes, before he made an excuse of he has to get back to base.
He said he ended the date as soon as they got talking she just kept ranting about her liberal politics, how she hates Trump, how global warming is affecting the world.
She offered to drive him back to base, but he cold not stand another minute of her, and got a taxi instead.
Since then she has texted him , and he told her there is no way he would ever want to meet her again due to her radical views.


29 posted on 05/26/2017 11:37:28 AM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Gator113
This will likely cost USAA hundreds of millions of dollars. I am very disappointed in USAA and I intend to personally cost them business, now and in the future.

I can understand the Liberal desire for the Virtue Signaling, and the Empathy Drive, etc... but I just cannot wrap my brain around folks who run businesses into the ground, losing vast amounts of business, all to very pointedly insult half of their consumer base. Fox News lost O'Reilly and Ailes and within a matter of weeks, they have gone from solidly and constantly #1 to struggling in third in the ratings. What could possibly make reasonable businesspeople, whose fiduciary duty to the stockholders is the Bottom Line first, simply shove away massive amounts of market share? I just don't get it.

30 posted on 05/26/2017 12:02:08 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

Switch to Navy Federal Credit Union


31 posted on 05/26/2017 4:19:16 PM PDT by Rumierules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson