More from the never ending stream of FAKE NEWS. These idiots apparently neither read nor understood “The Boy Who Cried Wolf”.
Trump has so many do-overs he needs to make re: key personnel (largely because he listened to Jared on the Priebus and other hirings), that he’d do best to correct as many as he can in one fell swoop as part of a well designed reorganization.
And OMG—Jared, along with bringing peace to the Middle East, managing key relationships with China, etc., and reinventing government, among many other assignments in his portfolio, is now working on prison reform? And Trump is upset with Sessions, his AG, for stepping on snowflake Jared’s prison reform effort? (We know what would really happen—Jared’s liberal Democrat “prison reform” would be a disaster.)
He wants to wipe out Bannon at the same time that he gives his whole government over to Jivanka?
I can’t believe there is a single worthwhile senior “friend” of his giving him that horrific stew of advice!
If someone from Team Trump is lurking, the only advice I have is go even darker, dark like Ben Rich ran the F-117 program so you can do your work.
Part of it is IMHO the Press is 90% Dem's/Progressive/Obamatons, they must be really pissed that their team didn't win, but worse, they know they are already in limited access mode and the likes of Scott Spicer etc know their audience, and who they are dealing with aka this isn't friendly territory. I bet a lot of people here wouldn't trade their job for his for all the tea in China. Everyday all he faces in incoming...
“.......cutting people out of the information flow rather than firing them.”........
Might be a good way to go.
And neocon puppet, climate change Tillerson is one of the few getting praise? Yikes!!!
BS
Ah, more “sources” and “reports” and “suggestions” which add up to exactly ZERO.
“sources tell me... “ + “Axios”
Yeah, ok.
I am no fan of Kevin Williamson (or the crew over at NR generally), but he is spot on with this—and making Jivanka the COO of his administration is not the answer. (Rather they are a large part of the problem.)
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447612/trump-ambassadors-appointment-delays
I’d bet we see many staff changes over the next few years. And all decided by Trump’s plans going forward, not because he’s looking backwards and angry/irked/unstable/other-media-word-of-the-week.
From the campaign, I pictured Trump always wants to have “the right people” in positions at the right time. Most candidates wouldn’t think of using 3 difference campaign managers at different points in the campaign. But Trump had no problem changing personell when situation or needs changed. Rather than considering that an admission that the previous hire was bad he presented both being smart hires at the time for the current needs and moving forward. And people who left didn’t part on bad terms so it doesn’t seem like it’s because Trump was irked.
At this point Trump has a better idea of his staff/aide needs and likely has different needs than when he started. For example, it’s possible that Priebus was a huge help learning DC processes and making contacts, setting up meetings, etc, before. But those things aren’t as useful now. And Trump has a better idea of who his “enemies” in congress are and is no doubt planning ways to negotiate, which may need different approaches and people.
LMAO.
“The advice he’s getting is to go big — that he has nothing to lose,”
As far an anyone needs to read.
friends and outside advisers, most of whom he consults after dark
Yes but only on nights with no moon...in the dead of night.
Honestly the bias just oozes from these reporters/propagandists.
Bannon and Priebus have been fired so many times that Trump is sending them to N. Korea to ignite their Poodung missiles.
It’s pure speculation based on anonymous sources.
These kinds of rumors have been circulating in the media since the first Trump appointment.
These kinds of rumors of problems within the inner circle and with advisers, etc., will persist through the Trump presidency. That is what the media does; that is who they are.
As for the ‘White House sources’, I would not be at all surprised to learn that they are reporters in the Press tent on the White House campus.
White House sources tell me...the confidant said...
***********
There must be a long list that the media uses to attribute stories to unknown and unidentified people. A “source generator” if you will. Just pick and choose one for this week’s article (e.g., “highly placed source” or “someone close to the president”) from the list and, magically, there’s an instant excuse for another fake article. Its so obviously fabricated that its reached comical proportions.
This is the POLITICO fake news guy again. Has not been right yet.
This is from Mike Allen, right? Sorry, he’s a #fakenews lefty shill.