Interesting:
I wonder what liability these companies would incur for paying their employees to create public disturbances, commit acts of violence and vandalism, and to assault people?
An extremely rare act of journalism.
They are ALL paid.
Some directly, from Soros, to a few intermediaries, into their bank accounts... or,
Some indirectly, thru EBT, EIC, etc. They may have other odd jobs, too... like voting.
“growing number of tech companies who are paying their employees to participate in anti-Trump rallies”
...and the stupid lemmings go and do it. I guess they don’t mind handing over their jobs to foreigners.
Where is the list of companies? Inquiring minds want to know.
The San Francisco Chronicle wouldn’t be paying employees for protesting, would they?
Are these paid thugs citizens, immigrants, or illegal aliens?
If a company pays someone to go to a protest, then that person is acting as an agent of that company. If that paid protester were to assault you at that rally, then under the doctrine of respondeat superior you could sue the company and get both compensatory and punitive damages which could be in the millions.
If you are assaulted at a rally, tear the mask off and try to get a photo. If you find out the thug was a paid employee of a company, hire a top notch personal injury attorney. Not one who has to advertise on TV. Insurance doesn’t cover punitive damages and they can’t be discharged in bankruptcy. Hit them where it hurts.