Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump entertains breaking up big banks with Glass-Steagall
WASHINGTON EXAMINER ^ | May 1, 2017 | Joseph Lawler

Posted on 05/01/2017 4:48:53 PM PDT by huldah1776

[txt on image] Trump: Considering Rewrite or Elimination of Dodd-Frank

President Trump entertained the idea of breaking up big banks Monday, sending major Wall Street stocks lower.

Trump suggested that he is considering reinstating some form of Glass-Steagall, the repealed law that for decades mandated a separation between commercial and investment banks.

"There's some people that want to go back to the old system, right? So we're going to look at that," Trump said when asked about the policy by Bloomberg.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: 115th; banking; doddfrank; glasssteagall; goldman; second100days; trump; wallstreet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
This is a GREAT thing, right? Too bad last statement is that congressional republicans are against it. Gee, I wonder why?
1 posted on 05/01/2017 4:48:53 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

About time.


2 posted on 05/01/2017 4:51:09 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Privatized “bank” gains and socialized “bank” losses are bad for Americans.

Goldman Sachs is a investment betting house for big money players. That’s fine. What they shouldn’t get is insurance against loss paid for by me.


3 posted on 05/01/2017 4:52:38 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (The Washington Post is Jeff Bezos' Fake News unregulated SuperPAC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Those who are so inclined might want to pray for the safety of President Trump, his family and cabinet.


4 posted on 05/01/2017 4:55:34 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives.have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Yes yes yes yes. We need glass steagle. Taxpayers guarantee deposits in commercial banks. They’re put at unacceptable risk when the bank is allowed to invest those funds in risky stocks and worse.


5 posted on 05/01/2017 5:05:47 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776
separation between commercial and investment banks.

Infrastructure banks that are part of the "banking system" should be separate from banks that cater to investments and potential speculation. If your investment banker makes a bad investment on your behalf, that should not affect my ability to cash a check or make a car payment.

6 posted on 05/01/2017 5:18:22 PM PDT by Bernard (The Road To Hell Is Not Paved With Good Results)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

YES!


7 posted on 05/01/2017 5:49:27 PM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Glass-Stegall served America well for two-thirds of a century. A reasonable compromise would be to bring it back and make the "too big to fail" banks subject to it.

Then they have a choice: They are either subject to Glass-Stegall or they can break up so they are no longer big enough to be subject to it.

8 posted on 05/01/2017 5:51:50 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

>>>Yes yes yes yes. We need glass steagle. Taxpayers guarantee deposits in commercial banks.

How about instead of adding more regulations, we get rid of the FDIC and let the free market work. Depositor beware.


9 posted on 05/01/2017 6:11:50 PM PDT by oincobx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

While he’s at it, he should break up Google, Facebook, and the other massive, globo-fascist tech companies.


10 posted on 05/01/2017 6:17:10 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Government employees and welfare recipients are both net tax consumers. Often for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Yep. For a hint of what he is up against, I can only recommend the FX network series “Taboo”. Can you spell British East India Company?


11 posted on 05/01/2017 6:17:31 PM PDT by Yollopoliuhqui (Smarter - Faster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yollopoliuhqui

Yes, it’s actually very scary.


12 posted on 05/01/2017 6:25:11 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives.have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: oincobx

I personally believe that would be a mistake. People (and the economy) are benefitted by having somewhere they can save safely. People are thus encouraged to thrift ( which benefits them and helps pool funds for business and other investments). And needless casualties are avoided too. I view deposit insurance as a valuable part of our economic system.


13 posted on 05/01/2017 6:25:57 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

But couldn’t it be provided by the free market? You could purchase insurance from a third party that would cover your deposits in the event of a bank failure.


14 posted on 05/01/2017 6:39:40 PM PDT by oincobx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: oincobx

theoretically probably yes it could be provided by the free market but the FDIC has worked pretty well so far anyway, and we already have it and it (in my opinion, anyway) does miniscule harm to economic theory ... i view it rather like a bit of helpful infrastructure for our economic system, like government-built roads (yes, they too...and in the past often were...supplied by the private sector..but we didn’t get as many that way and thusly the govt doing it, for all the inefficiencies, provides discernable benefits for the economy and for us all)...compromises that are relatively small, imho, and the benefits are palpable.

i am in favor of free market solutions for most things, tho.
i openly admit to the compromises I do make, or am willing to accept. I do NOT accept Obamacare, I do NOT accept “free” government-run university education (indoctrination), I do NOT accept “free” govt-funded abortions, I do NOT accept a whole lot of “free” or “Govt” provided things.
I do still think that FDIC is a worthwhile compromise, imho, while acknowledging it is a compromise, yes.

Private insurers can go bankrupt just as easily as private banks, anyway.


15 posted on 05/01/2017 6:49:45 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Unless we separate retail banking from the speculative hedge fund side of these banks we risk multiple 2008 type bailouts and recessions.


16 posted on 05/01/2017 7:09:54 PM PDT by steve8714 (My wife calls me Dr. Smartacus. This makes me happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

Agreed. Strongly agreed.


17 posted on 05/01/2017 7:34:18 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Its starting to look like the insiders of both parties are castrating Trump.


18 posted on 05/01/2017 7:55:02 PM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon
While he’s at it, he should break up Google, Facebook, and the other massive, globo-fascist tech companies.

Trump is on record that he thinks Amazon has anti-trust issues. They dominate e-commerce and Cloud services.

19 posted on 05/01/2017 9:20:56 PM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Trump has done a lot of thinking and talking about what he was gonna do,now he has caved to the left wing kooks,but don’t worry I will pay you back for that hamburger next tuesday


20 posted on 05/02/2017 4:44:07 AM PDT by ballplayer (hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson