Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apparently repealing Obamacare could violate international law (sez the UN)
Washington Post ^ | 4/25/17 | Dana Milbank

Posted on 04/26/2017 1:41:24 AM PDT by Libloather

We’ve already seen that repealing Obamacare is politically perilous. Now there’s a new complication: It may also violate international law.

The United Nations has contacted the Trump administration as part of an investigation into whether repealing the Affordable Care Act without an adequate substitute for the millions who would lose health coverage would be a violation of several international conventions that bind the United States. It turns out that the notion that “health care is a right” is more than just a Democratic talking point.

A confidential, five-page “urgent appeal” from the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner on Human Rights in Geneva, sent to the Trump administration, cautions that the repeal of the Affordable Care Act could put the United States at odds with its international obligations. The Feb. 2 memo, which I obtained Tuesday, was sent to the State Department and expresses “serious concern” about the prospective loss of health coverage for almost 30 million people, which could violate “the right to social security of the people in the United States.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: international; law; obamacare; repeal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
They may need to chat with the exempt Democratics about all of this...
1 posted on 04/26/2017 1:41:24 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

FTUN!


2 posted on 04/26/2017 1:43:10 AM PDT by KevinB (Barack Obama: The best example in history of the dangers of affirmative action!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Translation = Obama’s swamp hacks are finding work at the United Nations. Possibly a mid Atlantic office in his server filled basement run by Valerie Jarrett.


3 posted on 04/26/2017 1:47:44 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Let the UN fund it then.


4 posted on 04/26/2017 1:49:43 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I spotted the writer’s name: Dana Milbank.

Moved right along to post this.


5 posted on 04/26/2017 1:51:50 AM PDT by onyx (Donate Monthly ~ Join 300 Club!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Excellent example of libtard logic and more good evidence for the push to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US.


6 posted on 04/26/2017 1:59:42 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2017; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"If repealing Obamacare violates international law, wasn’t the country in violation before Obamacare?"

The article seems to imply that obamacare is not also in violation of international law.
7 posted on 04/26/2017 2:01:18 AM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Telling the UN to take a effin flying leep off a tall building comes to mind. If this is true it never have reached President Trump and stopped at our UN ambassador. Where was she in this laughable discussion?


8 posted on 04/26/2017 2:03:52 AM PDT by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it, but ready to go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It violates UN law? Well I don’t think we needed this but I suppose it’s nice to have one more reason to repeal this turkey!


9 posted on 04/26/2017 2:15:00 AM PDT by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Sounds like she is full of it, just like the paper she works for.


10 posted on 04/26/2017 2:21:29 AM PDT by saintgermaine (The Time Traveler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The International Laws of Sovereignty say that the UN can stick their foolish musings up their collective rectum.


11 posted on 04/26/2017 2:38:17 AM PDT by Candor7 (i DO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

How to build the wall - tell the UN to ‘Go F Yourself.’ The money that goes to the UN can go to the wall...


12 posted on 04/26/2017 2:47:51 AM PDT by ConservaTeen (Islam is Not the Religion of Peace, but The religion of Pedophilia...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Hey, UN, let’s talk about Kim Jong Un and the health care rights of *his* people.


13 posted on 04/26/2017 2:48:52 AM PDT by Lauren BaRecall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I think it is about time to let the UN know the USA is a sovereign nation and if they do not like it we will cut off their funding.


14 posted on 04/26/2017 3:23:02 AM PDT by okie 54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Why bother voting? No need for congress.


15 posted on 04/26/2017 3:24:11 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog; Liz

Maybe the UN can intervene during the next Berkeley riot.


16 posted on 04/26/2017 3:34:44 AM PDT by Libloather (Trivial Pursuit question - name the first female to lose TWO presidential elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Obamacare is not “health care”; it’s insurance that rations socialized medicine. We had guaranteed medical care before Obamacare, since emergency rooms could not turn people away. It’s harder for those people to get actual medical care now. The correct conclusion is that Obamacare violates international law (and it violates the Constitution, but that never bothers democrats).


17 posted on 04/26/2017 3:36:28 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Sounds like the the UN needs to go then.

Well...Bye...

18 posted on 04/26/2017 3:48:08 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I remind my fellow Freepers who flamed me for comments he made to the members of the U.N. Security Council who were all invited to have dinner at the White House - a custom when the U.S. takes the rotating presidency of the council.

Trump was effusive of all the “great work” of the U.N. and the even greater work he hoped it would do in the future.

I said that if Trump believed all that he says we have a problem because the U.N. is the last place we want to get more involved and more powerful in the world.

I was flamed for not admitting what a “great” speech it was.

Giving, or even wanting, the U.N. more to do and more power has zero, zilch interest to the well being of the United States.


19 posted on 04/26/2017 5:36:05 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Throw the trash out on their face.


20 posted on 04/26/2017 6:31:06 AM PDT by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson