[RitaOK]

I second your second to Bigg Red. 👍 If Breitbart believes this Trump supporter is invested in Steve Bannon, over Trump, they err. I can not express exactly to what extent President Trump would have to mess up, imho, and he would still remain miles of universe better than anyone in recent occupation of the White House, at least since Reagan! Forget Obama and Hillary! I'm grateful to Bannon and I do believe he and Trump read our issues and anger, like a book, together. But, I'm afraid the DC & New York media were eating Trump to the bone, and making headway. Trump needed to stop the bleeding. (Particularly on the Hill among the Morning Joe crowd, on both sides of the aisle.) If it meant moving Bannon to the shadows, pretending a scandal in order to throw the impeachment seeking press a believable bone, then so be it. After all, the NY press partly loves the "liberal" looking Kirchners. To Trump, that's the best card to play for obvious reasons. WalLah! The press is appeased, and Bannon takes some heat, stays put and carries on. The Kirchners are seen but not heard and Bannon is heard, but not seen. Breitbart must roll with the plays. Trump is the master of the game, and his numbers are up, as this play was followed by the two big booms, in Syria and Afghanistan.

[RitaOK]

What happened to my paragraph spaces!?? So sorry. I’m on my cell phone!

[LS]

It’s Kushner.

I don’t know-—no confirmation-—but it wouldn’t surprise me that when the “get Bannon” stories started, Bannon didn’t respond with a few bombs of his own, hence DT’s ire and his “you fix it” comment. Again, I’m just guessing, but I think both sides are guilty.

One name noticeably absent-—which neither the drive bys or the “conservative/alt-right” media have mentioned is that of David Bossie, Citizens United chairman, who was brought on board the campaign at the same time as Bannon/Conway (I forget his exact title). Anyway, it would be useful to know his status.

[Bigg Red]

Voila