Posted on 04/07/2017 6:09:30 AM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper
Well Russia was pretty dumb to want Trump.
Direct hit.
> “former government officials say”
So who to believe? Susan Rice or your own good sense?
NYT is adjusting the timeline to assist a new Rice narrative.
Much of the hows and whys on Trump team surveillance is being kept from us.
Neither side really wants us to find out how it was captured who captured it and what who was the target? I can only conjecture as why.
Can anyone blame them? There’s a lot of upside to being able blackmail and bribe the US president if Hillary wins. But the US would still be very weak internationally with lots of global downside in the economy, terrorism, etc.
A strong US is better for everyone, including Russia, even if they can’t control the president like they could Hillary.
If Trump coordinated with them (no evidence yet), there is a problem. If they just wanted what’s best for them, then they were smart to try to help Trump just like Obama tried to sway elections for what he thought was best.
We know at least 3...Rice, Hillary, Obama...
Who else did the announcing on Benghazi??
NY Times = FAKE STREAM NEWS
CIA = CERTIFED KNOWN LIARS
Hillary had to pay 200 people to show up to her rallies 2 twice a week. Hence, why it only happened 2 days a week. The paid supporters would not work over the Weekends.
Now compare Hillary’s tiny rallies, unless she hijacked a celeberty of celebration rally, to Trumps who had thousands. Many had to get turned away.
So if you believe for 1 second the NY Times and the Globalists at the CIA that this is a Russian conspiracy, then you will fall for anything......
Brennen/Obama were and are full of shit.
So. If we are to believe this now and suddenly realize that the CIA is entirely comfortable in keeping information from the public, but also from a US President (Ubama WILL tell us he heard about it all we when we read it in the papers yesterday), just what conclusions is one supposed to draw regarding information given/provided to President Trump by the CIA regarding ANYTHING Syria did.
THIS is my dilemma as no doubt some of you have. Are we now to believe the CIA’s flip flopping ‘service’ to this country only when it suits them? Are they all or just most outright lies, presuming of course the decision to Cruise Missile Syria is largely CIA-based.
I’ll let this Syria thing with Trump work out without judgment for now, but I will tell you this: I WON’T EVER TRUST the CIA, FBI, NSA or any other organization still infested with Ubama plants at the highest levels. All of their Ubama holdovers have to be fired, completely - no access ever again, period.
Let me guess.
They found collusion going back to June 14, 1946 ?!?!
These days I look at the NY Slimes, the Washington Compost, and all the rest of the media as nothing more than a bunch of TV scriptwriters. This whole Russia narrative is just a show on Netflix and reporters from the print and TV media are writing episodes and making up stuff weekly as the Trump presidency proceeds.
They saw a talk show on RT were someone called Hillary ugly. Total Russian plot! Everyone knows she is stunningly beautiful.
The NYT and Ovama’s Deep State need to be investigated.
Your logic is iron clad. A perfectly rational Russia opposes all forms of socialism, like Hillary and the Dems.
Russia seeks rational, logical international relations, not harridan witchcraft.
Russia considers Radical Islam a scourge on planet earth. They naturally oppose the architect of ISIS.
I stopped reading where it said “New York Times”.
“Why didn’t the DNC handover their servers to the FBI after they were hacked by the Trump loving Russians?”
Also rhetorically, why didn’t the FBI TAKE them?
“Awww, the DNC wouldn’t let us look at the servers,” Comey’s balless allegedly impotent FBI claims.
But We the Sheeple can't see the "Evidence" because it's a "Seeeeecret".
Kinda like we won't be allowed to see the "evidence" the Sarin gas involved in recent Syrian fatalities didn't happen to be the chemical munitions Hillary and Co. gave to ISIS after her MoBro thugs "liberated" Libya.
Noooo. That "evidence" is a "Seeeeecret" too.
Quack Waddle -
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Clinton+Sarin+Benghazi
Bullshyte.
JAIL the HillaDuck!
I know what to make of it, fake news by three members in good standing of the fake news industry. The intelligence communities, the elite globalists, and the gray, older the the hills, lady.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.