Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: scottinoc

A couple observations, if I remember what I’ve recently read here:

1) Unmasking is allowable only if the “US Person” appears to be involved in something extremely serious — like terrorism.
2) The “US Person” who turned out to be Donald Trump was NOT implicated in any way, at any time, in any sort of criminal behavior.

And yet this particular “US Person” showed up in the President’s Daily Briefing on a regular basis? And the references to this “US Person” were so gosh darn compelling that Susan Rice said: “I just HAVE to know who this person is — let’s unmask this one!”

No.

No it just doesn’t work that way.


14 posted on 04/04/2017 3:35:16 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

Why would she even need to ask for an unmasking if the activity seen was unmistakably Trump? What did that serve except to get her into deeper dutch?


20 posted on 04/04/2017 3:42:56 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

...but then is changes from “US Person” to “US Official.”
Before/after the election?


43 posted on 04/04/2017 4:38:21 PM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson