Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/03/2017 9:45:39 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: LS

NUNCE dared call it “treason”!


93 posted on 04/03/2017 11:12:31 AM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

“We know-—that is, any sane person knows-—that she could not have done this without Zero’s complicit approval or a direct order.”

Wellllll......or Valery Jaratt ....who’s really running that enterprise....


98 posted on 04/03/2017 11:18:32 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Someone or many enacted felonies regarding the 2016 election for the benefit of the President, Hillary and the Democrat party.
This was so brazen that they continued this post election until they were forced to exit the White House as positions for them ceased.
To hell with the Senate, Trump will so scream about this from the mountain top that the process to prosecute these crimes IMO will be forced into enforcing the law.

In a way this shows us we also need voter ID reform. If Democrats are doing this kind of crap from the seats of government, why on earth would they not be breaking all rules and ethics on the ground during elections?

If people need ID for welfare and work, they must have it to vote and rolls need purging every four years for Federal elections.
People of good status should get free IDs if they can’t afford to pay, but we should go on denying people without IDs who are illegal or who may be trying to avoid law enforcement but still wanting to vote.

Clean out the rolls of the dead and repeats, and figure out how we have the SS of some 6 million 100 year old or so people active when they are most likely dead. How many of those are voting?


101 posted on 04/03/2017 11:24:10 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

ping


113 posted on 04/03/2017 11:59:57 AM PDT by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Eli Lake gives Ms. Rice a pass, says she did nothing wrong. Adding Susan Rice’s another “chase your tail” article prolonging the totally fake Russian story, other than the normal Surveillance of US government....it was Obama’s hidden government who was surveilling without warrants, American Citizens.


117 posted on 04/03/2017 12:07:53 PM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

‘We know this was done early, before Trump was the nominee, and so far we do NOT have any evidence that Yeb, Cruz, or Kasich were similarly “surveilled,” leading me to think that the Dems ONLY feared Trump.’

Great article. This is the only part I question. I believe [but can’t prove] that the surveillance of Trump was directly instigated by Obama, but not as a result of fear that Trump would win the election (Obama didn’t think that was possible). Rather, it comes down to Obama being a Malignant Narcissist, and the way MNs think.

Trump is the only truly prominent person in the US who has challenged Obama’s birther tales/birth certificate. You don’t do that to a Malignant Narcissist and get away with it—not if he can help it.

MNs see themselves as a sort of human-form diety. Their word should be revered, and never, EVER questioned. Trump broke the cardinal rule, and Obama has borne him a seething, simmering grudge ever since.

The Trump surveillance was Obama’s bid to get even with Trump. No one who knows the psychology of the Malignant Narcissist will doubt this. They are angry, arrogant, vengeful people. They will stop at nothing to even old scores.


121 posted on 04/03/2017 12:37:00 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS
-- We know this was done early, before Trump was the nominee, and so far we do NOT have any evidence that Yeb, Cruz, or Kasich were similarly "surveilled," leading me to think that the Dems ONLY feared Trump. --

No other candidate ever openly questioned Obama's qualification / birth certificate.

127 posted on 04/03/2017 2:01:56 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Thank you, LS.

bttt


128 posted on 04/03/2017 2:02:58 PM PDT by pax_et_bonum (Never Forget the Seals of Extortion 17 - and God Bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Right. Only Trump was spyed on. Please. We’re ALL being spyed on.


133 posted on 04/04/2017 9:43:23 AM PDT by subterfuge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson