Trump better a handle on this fast. His administration is springing more leaks than a ship made of swiss cheese.
she ordered Justice Department lawyers not to defend his first immigration order temporarily banning entry to United States
They should have also Filed a Formal “Abandonment of Client” case with the BAR Association and had her DISBARRED!!!
More WAPO agitprop.
If Yates has something to say, she can post it on social media.
Sally Yates is a Democrat, and was appointed by Obama.
I would have also blocked it. Once he discovered she was not in his camp, her position and authority, even if extant until firing, was NIL. She did not qualify as a spokesperson in the capacity for which she was called.
Yates is a lying, anti-American, Trump-hater. I don’t see a problem with this.
sally yates and wapo (the voice of the deep state) are two huuuuuge piles of excrement ....
anyone who believes either is misinformed...
both political operatives with a subversive agenda
hwere was salyy when the clintoons were play for pay with guestra putin uranium one and podesta joule stock...???
This is the WashingFake Post. They lie outright and often.
With all due respect..what they f—k would she know about Trump and Russia? that’s not even logical....
If it something the AG office was doing before Trump came in to office then Eric Holder would be the logical person to talk about it
If it was something after Trump came in to office while she was acting AG for that short time why would anybody from the Trump camp be telling her anything about Russia?
Trump and office in the 20th and she was out of office on the 30th that’s 10 days ...what possible unique information did she acquire in 10 days ?
This is political theater by the Dems because she made a name for not defending Trumps travel ban
WAPO forgot to mention that Obama and his predecessors blocked testimony in the name of executive privilege countless times, as a standard procedure. Protecting the principle often far outweighs the content of what the witness might say in the particular instance.
As much as Yates should be grilled regarding the Clinton email cover-up, illegal surveillance of Trump and his associates, etc., most Republicans on the Intel Committee lack the wits to turn this their way. The Dems would coordinate their questions to stage another propaganda fest, and the media would cherry pick to pronounce that Trump is GUILTY. Better off quashing the whole thing.
Considering where this article came from and the author of it, I call B.S.!!!
Isn’t Yates the political hack who let her foolish Communist-inspired opinions and emotions govern her actions rather than being guided by the law?
Yates clearly showed by her actions that she was unfit to hold any position of public responsibility, let alone the high position from which she was removed.
Such positions must be filled by individuals having the highest ethical standards as well as a respect for the law and a high level of trustworthiness, none of which were evidenced by Sally Yates’ reckless and personally-motivated actions.
White House just said otherwise (she is not blocked) apparently turning out to be fake news.
More WaPo FUD.
It is friggin amazing how many people on this board jump on things put out by the NYT, WP and other MSM as being factual. This is a lie by the WP. The WH did not claim Executive Privilege to keep her from testifying which is what the WP is trying to claim. This is more fake news by the fake news WP.
And? So ?