Angelina Jolie’s Latest Adoption Scandal

yahoo ^ | 3/20.17 | Elizabeth Durand Streisand

[BlatherNaut]

Are you?

Are you? Why so aggressively defensive?

AJ appears to be a man -- a man who is openly transgendering a young child.

[x]

Why so aggressively defensive?

Why so needlessly cruel?

AJ appears to be a man

That says more about you than her.

What satisfaction do you get out of saying such crazy things?

[BlatherNaut]

Do you support gay marriage? Do you support the transgender agenda? Do you support the transgendering of young children? Do you support "bathroom bills" promoted by transgenders? Am asking because your responses seem overly defensive in light of the fact that the individual under discussion here is a public figure who also happens to be an internationally recognized LGBT advocate.

Please explain how it is "cruel" to question whether or not a celebrity LGBT activist with visible male characteristics is transgendered?

[x]

Angelina Jolie was not a man who got a sex change operation.

One would have to be stupid to think that and insensitive to insist on it.

If she was born biologically deformed in some way, it definitely is cruel to bring it up.

If you disagree with her on some issue, it doesn't justify personal abuse of someone who is primarily known as an entertainer, not a politician.

[BlatherNaut]

If you disagree with her on some issue, it doesn't justify personal abuse of someone who is primarily known as an entertainer, not a politician.

Absurd. "Entertainers" who serve as UN functionaries and get invited to the Vatican are in a league of their own. Again, please explain how questioning whether someone is transgendered constitutes "personal abuse". In light of the incessant rhetoric, one might presume transgendering is something to celebrate. Apparently some want to have it both ways. Hypocrisy abounds.

[x]

I've gotten really sick of fake news and tired of people who start baseless rumors because they don't like or agree with people.

Attempts to justify dishonest rumors on ideological grounds don't fly and disgrace the causes the liars claim to support.

And you didn't just "question." In one of your responses, you said "AJ appears to be a man."

Fortunately most people aren't as spiteful as you are, so your asinine theory didn't make any headway.

[BlatherNaut]

Another day, another absurd scolding from “x”, replete with the usual Saul Alinsky tactics.

Irritating fans, shills and bots are bad PR for celebrities who position themselves as opinion leaders. One who continuously posts personal insults in defense of a celebrity whom no one really knows or cares about reeks of shill.

If you are not an AJ shill, you really ought to catch up on the widespread transgenderism currently being exposed throughout the entertainment, sports and media realms. It is not an isolated phenomenon. The true “fakes” are those who represent themselves falsely and even worse, pretend to be disinterested observers while publicly advocating for societal transformation.

[x]

Whatever. Your cockamamie theory isn't going anywhere.

Neither is this conversation. Good riddance, troll.

[BlatherNaut]

LOL. Couldn't resist flinging a final insult, I see.

Sayonara, "x".

[PLMerite]

Here she is when she had a real job:

[Prince of Desmond]

Regardless of whatever else Jolie may or may not be, I think she’s well established as a liberal Hollywood tumour. Seems rather odd that a long-time Freeper would play white knight for such a creature.