Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alabama House Passes Pro-Life Bill Saying There is No Right to Abortion
life news ^ | march 17, 2017 | Micaiah Bilger

Posted on 03/19/2017 1:59:56 PM PDT by Morgana

Alabama lawmakers are preparing for the day when Roe v. Wade is overturned.

Abortion will not become illegal immediately when Roe is overturned; instead, the power to legislate abortion will return to the states.

On Thursday, the Alabama House passed a bill that would protect unborn babies’ right to life in the event that Roe is overturned; legislators voted 67-14 in favor of the measure, Alabama Media Group reports.

The Associated Press reports the bill would amend the state constitution to declare Alabama a “right to life” state. If the bill passes the state Senate, the amendment also would have to be approved by voters on the 2018 ballot.

Here’s more from the AP:

“We want to make sure that at a state level, if Roe v. Wade is overturned, that the Alabama Constitution cannot be used as a mechanism by which to claim that there is a right to abortion,” said state Rep. Matt Fridy, the legislation’s sponsor.

The proposed constitutional amendment says it would be Alabama’s public policy “to recognize and support the sanctity of unborn life and the rights of unborn children, most importantly the right to life.”

Fridy disputed any notion that politics were at play and said Alabama is “a pro-life state.” Trump easily won Alabama in November with 62 percent of the vote.

Other states such as Missouri and Utah have approved similar “right to life” measures.

Local Planned Parenthood leaders blasted the legislation, saying it would “completely outlaw abortion.”

SUPPORT PRO-LIFE NEWS! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation during our Fall Support Campaign

Democrats in the House also expressed concerns about legal challenges, but Fridy said he does not think there will be a legal challenge because the amendment would prohibit abortions only if Roe v. Wade is overturned, according to the local news report.

Many pro-lifers felt hopeful after President Donald Trump promised to nominate “pro-life” justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. Vice President Mike Pence said those justices could pave the way to consign Roe to “the ash heap of history where it belongs.” However, Trump would have to appoint several justices to the high court who are willing to overturn Roe and the Senate would have to confirm them before the infamous abortion decision has a chance of being reversed.

In January, the pro-abortion group NARAL predicted that 13 states have laws or constitutional provisions that immediately would ban abortions if the high court overturns Roe. According to the group, the states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota and West Virginia.

However, this is just one of many estimates. In 2012, NARAL itself gave a different prediction, saying 17 states immediately would ban abortions if Roe is overturned. Attorney Paul Linton in the journal “Issues in Law and Medicine” estimated the number of states at somewhere between eight and 11.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: abortion; alabama; prolife
The day Roe is overturned...it's coming.
1 posted on 03/19/2017 1:59:56 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Democrats in the House also expressed concerns about legal challenges, but Fridy said he does not think there will be a legal challenge because the amendment would prohibit abortions only if Roe v. Wade is overturned, according to the local news report.

Logic always fails the Democrats. This proposed State constitutional amendment would, by its own terms, go into effect only if it would not violate the U.S. Constitution as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court. How could that be unconstitutional?

2 posted on 03/19/2017 2:08:44 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I pray The Lord it will be!


3 posted on 03/19/2017 2:09:05 PM PDT by trustandobey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
My recollection is that the basis for the SCOTUS decision on R v W was of a discovery in the Constitution for "privacy". Despite the absence of that word in the Constitution the SCOTUS derived one.

In our current times when there is absolutely NO pretense of privacy in our lives, how is it that R v W can endure?

We now know that our government intercepts and records all of our electronic messages. If somehow the SCOTUS is compelled to revisit R v W will they again use privacy as a ploy to prevent States from deciding for themselves? That would be outrageous.

4 posted on 03/19/2017 2:15:50 PM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
In our current times when there is absolutely NO pretense of privacy in our lives, how is it that R v W can endure?

The Supreme Court's references to a "right to privacy" have always been about sex (contraception, abortion, sodomy). To the Supreme Court, sexual privacy is the only privacy that matters.

5 posted on 03/19/2017 2:19:20 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Good. Time to step on the throats of liberals everywhere. We’ve been waiting for 8 damn years.


6 posted on 03/19/2017 2:26:57 PM PDT by max americana (For the 9th time FIRED LIBERALS from our company at this election, and every election since 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

There is no constitutional right to privacy, abortion, or any other number of false ‘rights’ created by the left in the last 30 years or so. If something is not specifically referenced in the Constitution or Bill of Rights (in the manner the idea was viewed at the time either was being written),it falls to the states to determine its merits for good or for ill. I am not a constitutional authority by any stretch of the imagination, so why can I see this clearly as a states’ issue and the leftists do not?


7 posted on 03/19/2017 2:27:32 PM PDT by bigredkitty1 (March 5, 2010. Rest in peace, sweet boy. I will miss you, Big Red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Abortion never was in the Constitution. Over 60,000,000 babies have been killed illegally in this country, making the USA the most ruthless killer nation in history. You really think God is going to let us get away with it?


8 posted on 03/19/2017 2:30:50 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

67-14 in favor. Man that’s good.


9 posted on 03/19/2017 2:50:40 PM PDT by mrs. a (It's a short life but a merry one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Good job, Alabama!


10 posted on 03/19/2017 3:02:52 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Ping


11 posted on 03/19/2017 3:17:00 PM PDT by StoneWall Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I still cannot...do not want to believe that the United States government actually funds murder.


12 posted on 03/19/2017 3:44:31 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

10th Amendment - State Rights.


13 posted on 03/19/2017 3:50:08 PM PDT by keving (We are the Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
From what I have read about the Roe-v-Wade decision,
the majority stated that they made their decision on the premise that the Constitution was silent on when life begins.
So perhaps instead of trying to overturn this hideous over reach of nonintellectual blather.
States should pass laws the state that they, "The State" recognize that life begins at conception.
14 posted on 03/19/2017 4:01:30 PM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson