Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fired U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara Said to Have Been Investigating HHS Secretary Tom Price
ProPublica ^ | 03/17/2017 | Robert Faturechi

Posted on 03/17/2017 11:25:58 AM PDT by GIdget2004

Former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, who was removed from his post by the Trump administration last week, was overseeing an investigation into stock trades made by the president’s health secretary, according to a person familiar with the office.

Tom Price, head of the Department of Health and Human Services, came under scrutiny during his confirmation hearings for investments he made while serving in Congress. The Georgia lawmaker traded hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of shares in health-related companies, even as he voted on and sponsored legislation affecting the industry.

Price testified at the time that his trades were lawful and transparent. Democrats accused him of potentially using his office to enrich himself. One lawmaker called for an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, citing concerns Price could have violated the STOCK Act, a 2012 law signed by President Obama that clarified that members of Congress cannot use nonpublic information for profit and requires them to promptly disclose their trades.

The investigation of Price’s trades by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, which hasn’t been previously disclosed, was underway at the time of Bharara’s dismissal, said the person.

(Excerpt) Read more at propublica.org ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: preet; targettomprice; tomprice; trumpcabinet; trumphhs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 03/17/2017 11:25:58 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Who told him to do that?


2 posted on 03/17/2017 11:27:11 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

OMG how stupid is that.


3 posted on 03/17/2017 11:32:05 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

and who leaked it?


4 posted on 03/17/2017 11:34:19 AM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Congress exempted ITSELF from insider trading laws.

They ALL do it.


5 posted on 03/17/2017 11:35:10 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

He had his money in a blind trust.


6 posted on 03/17/2017 11:41:50 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Why is it any whiff of a violation by a GOP guy and comes a full blown investigation BUT any prima facia violation by a dem goes unnoticed.


7 posted on 03/17/2017 11:43:02 AM PDT by Mouton (There is a new sheriff in town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Oh, gee, another lying, cheating, greedy opportunistic scumbag in our government—what a surprise!


8 posted on 03/17/2017 11:46:38 AM PDT by W. (Out with scum in government just there to steal our treasure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shalom aleichem
and who leaked it?

Preet Bharra
9 posted on 03/17/2017 11:46:43 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shalom aleichem

and who leaked it?

...

It says right in the article:

according to a person familiar with the office.

The same person who said Sean Hannity pointed a gun at Juan Williams.


10 posted on 03/17/2017 11:51:32 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

“Democrats accused him of potentially using his office to enrich himself.”

Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa!
Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa!

*BIG BREATH*

Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa!
Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa! Ha-Haaa-Haaa!

OMG! That’s RICH coming from those loathsome creatures!


11 posted on 03/17/2017 11:54:01 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I do not see how Congress could take exception to any other politician over insider trading.


12 posted on 03/17/2017 11:55:22 AM PDT by Herman Ball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I do not see how Congress could take exception to any other politician over insider trading.


13 posted on 03/17/2017 11:55:22 AM PDT by Herman Ball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Oh, look! More unnamed sources from the Obama Administration!


14 posted on 03/17/2017 11:55:29 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; TWhiteBear; WildHighlander57; Velveeta; Sal; ...

Article, # 7 , and other comments.

Thanks...

15 posted on 03/17/2017 11:59:45 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I’m sure Obama’s “justice” department started investigations on virtually everyone in Trump’s circle.


16 posted on 03/17/2017 12:00:20 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Yes, their before and after networth can be a staggering difference between the two.


17 posted on 03/17/2017 12:01:30 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
"He had his money in a blind trust."

If that was true, and I have no reason to doubt you, then what was Preet investigating? Sounds like a Obama partisan witch hunt.

18 posted on 03/17/2017 12:01:33 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Plus LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Obviously, this preet idiot was too busy with Price to investigate the criminal clintoons and their phoney foundation. ...and just how many years did this partisan shill have that office???


19 posted on 03/17/2017 12:07:34 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
Hey Preet, what about Hillary, what about her home server, her emails, what about Weiner, what about Huma, what about Huma’s connection to the Saudis, what about the Weiner laptop, Where is the hard drive, what about the Clinton Foundation, the Pay to Play by Hillary and Bill, what about the Clinton Global Initiative, what about Pizzagate? ? Oh,. . What? What did you say? That stuff is off limits? I see. .
20 posted on 03/17/2017 12:17:48 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only Hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson