[Gaffer]

...or facilitating their plans to flee to Canada

I have no problem with this new age URR fast tracking these illegals' asses out of this country to Canada. The quicker the better. The problem I have is them illegally sheltering these illegals in order for them to stay here.

[x1stcav]

>modern-day underground railroad to ferry undocumented immigrants from house to house or into Canada.<

Why not back to Mexico, Guatemala, Peru, China, Barbados, Thailand, Pakistan, etc.

Why only Canada? Sure seems racist to me. All of those other places are garden spots. This way they’d get a free trip home.

[catnipman]

“ignore precedent”

as in establishing a new precedent of ACTUALLY enforcing the Federal law instead of ignoring the precedent of NOT enforcing Federal laws, right?

[mass55th]

They can underground railroad all they want, but this is the 21st century, not the 19th. Back then lips were sealed, and most people couldn’t be bought for their secrets. Today everyone is out for themselves, and snitches abound, especially for a price. There is no honor among thieves anymore. They’d give up their mother for a song.

[elpadre]

Pick out the most visible non-profit harboring illegals and charge them with every possible count for violation of the law. Then sit back and see how many get out of the business.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Apart from the lawlessness of it all, I’m fine with them being sent to Canada. With a fertility rate of 1.4, Canada needs all the warm bodies that it can get. Ours is 1.9, so there’s still hope for us.

[freedumb2003]

They clothe, house and feed the illegals and then transfer them to Canada?

I say stand back and let ‘em go.

[TLI]

Canada? Sure!

Now we can start the north wall to keep them there.

.

[grania]

What are they going to do with these invaders in their houses? If they have them do any kind of work, isn't that slavery, assuming they can't leave? And if they pay them, isn't it illegal to hire invaders? How does this work with all kinds of laws about occupation, sanitation, etc? What happens if they're kicked out and turn on their former hosts? What about children not attending school? Who provides for medical care and basic necessities?

The only sensible answer is to provide invaders transportation to safety in Canada. It's not like the old days....it's at most a one-day drive to get to that border.

Won't it be fun when all these folks are on Canada's doorstep?

And, oh yeah, have any of these dogooders offered the same generosity for homeless veterans?

[Hattie]

Lots of crazy people in America nowadays. Where do they all come from?

[Vince Ferrer]

This turns an asset, a cheap laborer, into a cost.

[TangoLimaSierra]

When it is found out which org or individual is housing illegals, let them know they are being watched, and those illegals will be arrested when they try to leave. See how long the bleeding hearts will want to feed and house them.

[Vendome]

Blacks everywhere celebrate the liberation movement...

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Barack Obama doesn’t just hold the record for deportations, but actually deported more illegal aliens than all the presidents of the 20th century combined.

Nonsense. As with everything else he did, he lied about that too.

If you believe he actually did that then you are a true blue idiot.

[Vision]

It's disguising to compare illegal aliens willfully breaking the law to slaves seeking freedom.

[kabar]

Barack Obama doesn’t just hold the record for deportations, but actually deported more illegal aliens than all the presidents of the 20th century combined.

A steaming heap of BS. Obama has deported less than any President since Nixon.

New Statistics: Enforcement Continues Decline in 2016

The great majority of deportations (72%) completed by ICE are border crossers who were initially arrested by the Border Patrol or port of entry officers and turned over to ICE for deportation. Most of the rest are aliens who were arrested in the interior, with only a handful of cases (less than 1%) initiated by other agencies.

In previous administrations, border crossers did not make up a large share of deportations credited to ICE. The inclusion of hundreds of thousands of border cases in ICE deportation totals became the basis for deceptive Obama administration claims of “record deportations” beginning in 2012, when in fact, deportations resulting from interior enforcement were dropping sharply. Exposure of this statistical manipulation by the Center led then-incoming DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson to acknowledge that Obama administration deportation statistics are not comparable with those of previous administrations.

Interior deportations fell to 46,511 to date, according to the report, putting ICE on pace to complete 63,700 this year. This is approximately one-fourth the number of interior deportations completed by ICE in 2009, the first year of the Obama administration.

ICE Deportations Hit 10-Year Low

Obama Administration Has the Lowest Rate of Deportations Since the Nixon Administration

Since Obama took office, the groups opposed to immigration enforcement have relentlessly leaned on their allies in the administration to ease up on deportations. At the same time, aware of public and congressional expectations that the laws be enforced, the administration has tried to create the impression that enforcement has been robust under Obama. The administration and its allies frequently point out that more than two million removals have occurred since 2009, an accomplishment that they characterize as record-breaking.

But counting only removals as deportations presents a misleading picture of the level of enforcement. Removals are just one form of the deportation process that can be executed by any of the three DHS enforcement agencies (ICE, Border Patrol, and CBP officers at the port of entry). All three enforcement agencies also can process deportable aliens as a return (sometimes known as voluntary return), which is a lesser consequence. In general most border deportations are processed as returns and most interior deportations are processed as removals, but in recent years many more aliens apprehended at the border have been turned over to ICE for a brief period of detention and then removed in recent years, in a departure from the traditional "you catch 'em, you clean 'em" policies, where the arresting agency typically handles the deportation process. In addition, illegal border-crossers who have been removed previously, or who are prosecuted for smuggling or other crimes are turned over to ICE for processing. Under these scenarios, the Border Patrol will count the case as an apprehension, which is their marquee enforcement metric, and ICE will count the case as a deportation.

Under Obama, a much larger number of Border Patrol cases were transferred to ICE for processing than had been the case under prior administrations. In 2008, the last year of the George W. Bush administration, just over a third of deportations credited to ICE were border cases, and two-thirds were interior cases. In 2016, more than two-thirds of the deportation cases credited to ICE were border cases, and less than a third were interior cases.

Thus a comparison of removal numbers alone is not meaningful or sufficient to evaluate the relative deportation performance of the Obama administration. Focusing only on removal numbers produces an inflated picture of enforcement.

For a more accurate apples-to-apples comparison of enforcement from year to year, it is more appropriate to examine interior deportations and border deportations as separate and distinct types of enforcement. As noted above, the interior deportations have declined considerably since 2010. Neither the Border Patrol nor CBP publishes the total number of deportations executed, and many of the cases are transferred to ICE, so year-by-year comparisons of border deportations alone are impossible using open source statistics. However, it is possible to compare total deportations executed by all immigration agencies using figures on removals and returns that have been tracked by the immigration agency since 1892, and now appear in the Yearbook.

The Obama administration has completed a total of 5.3 million deportations, counting both interior and border cases. That is a little over half the number of deportations under the George W. Bush administration. The true record for deportations was set by the Clinton administration, which completed 12.3 million deportations.

As Table 1 shows, the Obama administration completed the lowest average annual number of deportations since the Nixon administration. Notably, the number of border-crossers (and probably the number of recidivists) is much less now than was the case under the Bush and Clinton administrations, and that is probably the main reason total deportations are lower; but the Obama administration simply could explain that, rather than try to artificially manufacture a record by cherry-picking one type of deportation to count.

[Bubba_Leroy]

Here is a direct link to the statute cited in the article:

8 U.S. Code § 1324 – Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

[jmaroneps37]

Is there a GoFundMe to help this great service to America get off the ground?

[Uncle Sam 911]

Who cares if they go to Canada, let em go. Canada wants them, we don’t, the matter is settled.

[jsanders2001]

> Churches across the US are fighting back against the Trump administration’s mandate to ramp up deportations with new sanctuary practices of their own, using private homes in their congregations as shelter and potentially creating a modern-day underground railroad to ferry undocumented immigrants from house to house or into Canada.

I bet the real reason is to receive government funding for the Unaccompanied Alien Child Program. I looked up the amounts that Catholic Charities, Southwest Key Program (run by La Raza members), and Baptist Family Services awhile back and the amounts were staggeringand increased exponentionally under Obama's watch. The churches would have absolutely no problems keeping themselves afloat with the extremely high dollar amounts they were receiving.

In other words, just like politicians, I don't think the "churches' are being sincere in their concerns for the illegal immigrants. Not at all.