Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER, GORSUCH'S VIEW ON TRUMP'S TRAVEL BAN IS EVERYTHING
TMZ ^ | 2/7/2017 | staff

Posted on 02/25/2017 2:09:09 PM PST by Tours

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Tours

The Senate Majority Leader has stated publicly that Judge Gorsuch will be confirmed.

Senator Schmuck will have an opportunity to question Judge Gorsuch on the completely Constitutional travel ban. And I plan to have fun watching the Judge stand by the Constitution.


21 posted on 02/25/2017 2:30:05 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

“judges need to stand up to the prez”

No Chucky, Supreme Court Justices are supposed to review items relative to the Constitution.

It should actually be a pretty boring, braniac kind of job.
Reviewiing and comparing text of law against text of Constitution.
Woo Hoo, them’s exciting times.
But the Left has turned SCOTUS into s de facto law creation branch. Time to get it back in to the little, boring box it’s supposed to be in.


22 posted on 02/25/2017 2:30:18 PM PST by Macoozie (Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Thanks, Harry Reid, for “the nuclear option”.


23 posted on 02/25/2017 2:30:28 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours
Well thank you Chuck "the schmuck" Schumer for your little burst of "self-importance."

Gorsuch will be confirmed with or without your vote.

24 posted on 02/25/2017 2:35:46 PM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Since it might end up before the Court he won’t be able to comment on it.So Chuck will say he is dodging the question


25 posted on 02/25/2017 2:44:09 PM PST by Emergencyawesome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours
"Senator Chuck Schumer wants to make one thing clear ... ain't no way he'll vote to confirm Neil Gorsuch's nomination to the Supreme Court if ... "

Are there ANY circumstances under which Chuck E Cheese Schumer would support ANY Trump judicial nominee?

26 posted on 02/25/2017 2:44:25 PM PST by Sooth2222 ("Every nation has the government it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Well there “ain’t no way” Gorsuch will speak about such cases likely to come before the court. It is a violation of judicial ethics to engage in such discussions, or to debate issues in detail such as abortion, 2nd amendment, etc.


27 posted on 02/25/2017 2:45:37 PM PST by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Sorry Chuckie baby, he can’t answer. You’ll have to find something else to oppose him on.

Not that it matters...the Dems are not stupid enough to try to block Gorsuch.


28 posted on 02/25/2017 2:48:57 PM PST by BobL (In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

What a drama queen. Somebody knit that man a pussy hat. Please.


29 posted on 02/25/2017 2:49:36 PM PST by Kudsman (Trump or bust 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

He made the decision long before this issue. He will never support the nominee no matter what.


30 posted on 02/25/2017 2:54:20 PM PST by doug from upland (Are we dreaming or is Hillary finally really gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Well, Schumer already knows the answer. Gorsuch will not be goaded into answering that question, because it is possible that the case will be heard in the supreme court. If he answered he would make himself ineligible to give an official opinion.


31 posted on 02/25/2017 2:55:22 PM PST by americanbychoice3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Is this ban moot now or will they issue another EO this week AND appeal the first one? I hope that they do both and then it will be pending in front of the S.Ct. and the response is “I cannot respond to matters currently pending and on which I may be called to vote.”


32 posted on 02/25/2017 2:55:43 PM PST by Mercat (Men never do evil so fully and cheerfully as when they do it out of conscience.” (Blaise Pascal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Schemer won’t vote for him, or any other Trump nominee, no matter what...so who cares what he says?


33 posted on 02/25/2017 2:56:17 PM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

He has always acted like he cares about making people safe, whether it was airport screening, opposing Dubai Port Deal, yet he supports open borders and is putting us at risk with these refugees.


34 posted on 02/25/2017 3:04:24 PM PST by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Odd, I agree with Chucky on this one. I want to hear exactly what Gorsuch says about this.


35 posted on 02/25/2017 3:06:27 PM PST by onona (Keeping the faith will be our new directive for the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
It's not SUPPOSED to be an issue for the courts

But the left wants everything to be an issue for the courts.

36 posted on 02/25/2017 3:08:28 PM PST by onona (Keeping the faith will be our new directive for the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman

“Somebody knit that man a pussy hat.”

And nail it to his hollow head with railway spikes!


37 posted on 02/25/2017 3:17:09 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tours

This is something the judge may have to rule on if he is appointed so he will not comment on the issue.


38 posted on 02/25/2017 3:31:00 PM PST by Captain Compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tours

Well chuckle it is a violation of the canon of ethics for a judge to comment on a current case


39 posted on 02/25/2017 3:31:17 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shalom aleichem

Well there “ain’t no way” Gorsuch will speak about such cases likely to come before the court.

...

You’re right. I’ve always seen nominees decline to answer such questions. Not even Schumer is that dumb, so I think he’s trying to keep his idiot base happy.


40 posted on 02/25/2017 3:35:34 PM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson