He advocated pedophilia. He spoke in defense of man-child sexual relationships. The video is out there. I’ve watched it, in context. While he has said some great things in defense of conservatism, his sexual deviation kinda disqualifies him from speaking for us.
I agree with this.
I liked that he was taking on PC on college campuses around the country and his being gay was an amusing challenge for leftists.
However, he needs to say he was absolutely in error about ANY thirteen year old being capable of having consensual sex with an adult. CPAC was right to cancel.
If he, as he stated today, was a victim of child sexual abuse he needs therapy.
The statements on the Daily Mail from about 12 hours ago in context and not ‘fake news’ are beyond acceptable. Hebophilia is sexual attraction to those at puberty age and that’s basically what he advocated. The context was not as a joke or provocative statement.
Interesting to see what he says tomorrow.
Perhaps he’s disqualified to speak for you. Don’t presume to tell me who is qualified to speak for me.
I had to unfollow him on Facebook months ago because of lewd content in some of his posts. Now it sounds like he would approve of NAMBLA. He’s way too far out on the perversion side for any Freeper to follow IMO.
Have all the “conservatives” who piled on Trump and preferred Hillary disqualified too? Because I’m not part of that “us”
He defends Christianity more boldly and more eloquently than many Christians can. Prayers for the LORD to comfort him and that Milo draws ever closer to saving faith. <3
“He advocated pedophilia. He spoke in defense of man-child sexual relationships. The video is out there. I’ve watched it, in context. While he has said some great things in defense of conservatism, his sexual deviation kinda disqualifies him from speaking for us.”
Totally agree . I believe Milo is perverted and somewhat unhinged based on what I have seen in his conversations with various individuals . I don’t blame CPAC & others for cutting ties with him .
I don’t know why anyone would be surprised that an openly homosexual man would defend pedophilia. It’s not like they have a moral compass to begin with.
He did no such thing.
And honestly, if you can't tell this is another "Access Hollywood: grab them by the pussy" ploy against THE most effective speaker we have to young people, you're not a conservative: you're a luddite.
...”He advocated pedophilia. He spoke in defense of man-child sexual relationships. The video is out there. I’ve watched it, in context. While he has said some great things in defense of conservatism, his sexual deviation kinda disqualifies him from speaking for us.”...
I come from a BIG family and several of my extended family members are gay and younger than me so I have had the advantage of being close to them and have watched them grow up. The one trait I notice in all of them is a lack of filter about almost everything. All are emotional about their preference and it is evident that it is the most important part of life for them and they express it in every way they can. They are colorful and entertaining and VERY energetic, being involved in things which most would consider to be anti-Christian. None have suffered from any kind of discrimination from within the family. All are loved unconditionally but that love is not reciprocated if anyone disagrees with one tiny part of what they believe. So, we walk on eggs lest we appear “offensive.” I believe Mylo’s popularity and first hand knowledge of how widespread pedophilia is caused him to misunderstand how abhorrent it still is to the majority in this country, and that was a risk that the publishers could not afford to take. As I understand it, he was a valuable tool for conservatives, in that he understood the principles of freedom. This is a case which clearly demonstrates the ruling of emotion and passion over logic and good sense and just might have ruined his life. He needs to understand that tolerance of his sexual preferences does not mean that people will accept every single part of his belief system or lifestyle.
Just to be clear, he did not advocate pedophilia.
He did not advocate pedophilia. Pedophilia is sex with a pre-pubescent child. He denounced that in no uncertain terms.
He did, however, discuss the difficulties experienced by persons like himself who were seduced under the age of consent but after the age of puberty, which is defined as hebephilia in early teens and ephebophilia in older teens. These are clinically different thresholds than pedophila, as he has attempted to clarify, being himself a victim of sexual molestation and statutory rape, and obviously struggling to come to terms with it.
Ordinarily, the left adores victims and encourages them to use their condition to batter, blame, sue and denounce society but never to put it behind them -- instead, they must make their victimization an "identity." And the right prides itself on compassion for victims, along with wanting victims not to wallow, but to achieve healing and renewal. But because Milo is rejecting the left's "born that way" battering ram, progressives despise him and want to destroy him. And because the right is in large part ignorant about many of the yucky aspects of illegal underage sex, many react with blanket condemnation instead of learning how or why to be appropriately compassionate.
While he has said some great things in defense of conservatism, his sexual deviation kinda disqualifies him from speaking for us.
He has never accepted the label of "conservative", so what is your point? But to the extent that he rejects the fundamental untruths being put forward by Political Correctness, Marxist social theory and the complicit media, and to the extent that he admires and upholds the uniquely American right to free speech (even his native UK has no equivalent to our First Amendment), he is helpful to "the right."
Being grateful for his voice does not make one also gay or in favor of the gay political agenda; even Milo is not in favor of the gay political agenda other than being allowed to engage in the lifestyle with other consenting adults without being jailed or violently persecuted for it. Appreciating the pro-free speech message delivered by an imperfect vessel actually is more conservative than the shut-it-down message to speech hated by the fascist left, who demand obedience to their version of social justice.
We who believe in the freedoms of conscience and the rest of the Bill of Rights are not so quick to condemn a person who openly admits he is conflicted about his ow sexuality and who has rejected the homosexual political agenda over and over.
T H A T