Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

They shouldn't be allowed to work anywhere if they failed background checks on an SF86. The adjudication criteria don't change just because of the level of clearance...the only difference is how hard the investigators look.
1 posted on 02/16/2017 6:14:29 PM PST by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: markomalley

And yet Muslim Brotherhood members have been working in the White House for the last eight years....


2 posted on 02/16/2017 6:16:38 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Probably the credit check gets some of them. Under Clinton it was drug use.


3 posted on 02/16/2017 6:16:41 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

dopers?


4 posted on 02/16/2017 6:16:58 PM PST by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Shows the TRUMP ADMINISTRATION only hires those who are qualified.


5 posted on 02/16/2017 6:19:14 PM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Psalm 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Six? Let me guess...

Mohamed, Mohamed, Mohamed, Mohamed, Mohamed, and...Akbar.


7 posted on 02/16/2017 6:24:28 PM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

It’s interesting that the three Muslims hackers the Democrats hired passed a background check since they had credit problems.


9 posted on 02/16/2017 6:26:16 PM PST by Bodleian_Girl (Trump: "I'm not going to tell you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Drug and credit background? Great! These surely are some indication of clearance-worthy or not. But what about past known subversive associates? That’s an even better indicator, certainly. obama himself, hillary herself could not have passed that one.
Oh, but those were special cases huh?


10 posted on 02/16/2017 6:26:40 PM PST by Migraine (Diversity is great- -- until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Background check system changes c2016
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3471402/posts


11 posted on 02/16/2017 6:26:51 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

maybe Trump could pardon them.. who can pass a background check these days anyway? ;-)


14 posted on 02/16/2017 6:31:25 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Normal stuff. Many don’t pass the background checks for mundane reasons


16 posted on 02/16/2017 6:34:07 PM PST by pissant ((Deport 'em all))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

How the hell do you “fail” a SF86? Are people reporting on this that stupid or do they think the people reading their work are that stupid?


18 posted on 02/16/2017 6:36:44 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Must be some extreme vetting that got them.


20 posted on 02/16/2017 6:44:40 PM PST by TexasCruzin (Trump is the man. #TrumpPence16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I’ve filled out 3 of them in my time.


23 posted on 02/16/2017 6:51:31 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

T T T T ! ! ! ©


24 posted on 02/16/2017 6:53:17 PM PST by onyx (DONATE MONTHLY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

no lie detector tests??


25 posted on 02/16/2017 6:53:27 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Is this real news? If so, it’s a HUGE story, far bigger than Trumps combative Press Conference. This is an earthquake with few precedents.


26 posted on 02/16/2017 6:55:51 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Some jobs you just don’t need a security clearance. If Caroline Wiles committed a minor offense sometimes in her past, Trump seems like he’s just trying to be fair-not heartless.


30 posted on 02/16/2017 7:09:28 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I guess people’s memory are not what they used to be. Back when Billy Jeff Clinton, or as I call him, the Hillbilly Whorehopper, back when over half his nominations and hires could not pass drug screening, he changed hiring practices and hired all of them under some other classification that did not require any urine, hair, or blood samples. Creepozoids all.


31 posted on 02/16/2017 7:31:06 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

This is the way the system is supposed to work. Readers may recall that Ben Rhodes, Obama’s former Deputy NSA, ran into the same problem back in 2009. He was cleared anyway. I wonder how many other Obama staffers failed their initial background checks and were still given clearances.


33 posted on 02/16/2017 7:41:08 PM PST by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

The SF 86 is the basic application for Federal service. From there, all fed employee applicants have a basic back ground check. Then more as clearance requires. The SF 86 Is not a security questionnaire.


41 posted on 02/16/2017 10:34:24 PM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson