HOW does CNN know this?? More FISA Warrant violations?
As a talking head said on Bloomberg today, "The goal is to REMOVE TRUMP. Failing that, to change the way he is running things..."
THE COUP HAS STARTED.
1 posted on
02/14/2017 8:16:24 PM PST by
tcrlaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: tcrlaf
Polygraph tests for everyone in National Security who would have access to that information. EVERYONE.
2 posted on
02/14/2017 8:19:21 PM PST by
vladimir998
(Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
To: tcrlaf
The Left will stop at NOTHING to regain control over this country.
3 posted on
02/14/2017 8:19:42 PM PST by
originalbuckeye
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: tcrlaf
I hope the anti Globalist don’t cower if they succeed. That should mark the beginning of another civil war
To: tcrlaf
Let them talk. Trump is no Commie.
5 posted on
02/14/2017 8:19:57 PM PST by
ConservativeMind
("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
To: tcrlaf
Show me the evidence or shut up. Better yet, prove what you’ve said or resign from the intelligence community. We already have CNN if we want fake news.
6 posted on
02/14/2017 8:22:29 PM PST by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: tcrlaf
This is an old story about how the FBI during the Obama Administration wanted FISA to issue warrants for wire taps, but was denied. Seems the NYT has republished the report which CNN and others will pickup as NEWS. Here is the FISA report:
Denied FISA warrant
To: tcrlaf
So Obama used the NSA CIA FBI SS to spy on the trump campaign? Isn’t that in essence what is reported here? Is that legal?
To: tcrlaf
And the key here is they were briefed meaning there was nothing to it. Just piling on the Flynn story.
9 posted on
02/14/2017 8:25:21 PM PST by
QuigleyDU
To: tcrlaf
CNN and NYT were both breifed simultaneously by the Black Hats.
10 posted on
02/14/2017 8:25:34 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(The Washington Post is Jeff Bezos' Fake News unregulated SuperPAC.)
To: tcrlaf
“The communications were intercepted during routine intelligence collection targeting Russian officials and other Russian nationals known to US intelligence”
Bullshit. Funny how Hillary was never intercepted. The intelligence community including the FBI was targeting Trump personnel.
To: tcrlaf
“suspected Russian operative” = Russian Ambassador
13 posted on
02/14/2017 8:27:04 PM PST by
piasa
To: tcrlaf
14 posted on
02/14/2017 8:27:29 PM PST by
Lopeover
(The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
To: tcrlaf
People “associated with” Trump or his campaign. OK. This “Russia decided the election” stuff is ridiculous. How? By talking to the Trump campaign? Mexico interfered 1000 times as much openly working for Hilary.
15 posted on
02/14/2017 8:29:26 PM PST by
Williams
(Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
To: tcrlaf
16 posted on
02/14/2017 8:29:45 PM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: tcrlaf
...according to US officials familiar with the matter...
McCain’s been a busy boy lately.
18 posted on
02/14/2017 8:30:27 PM PST by
McGruff
(Drain The Swamp)
To: tcrlaf
20 posted on
02/14/2017 8:31:46 PM PST by
indthkr
To: tcrlaf
One thing after another. Nice to read in the article that the other guy (not Flynn) denies completely that he knowingly talked to Russian operatives. At this point, I’d expect that he knows the conversations are all recorded and there is no point in lying, so I take some solace. Weird though, this constant drip of information about Russia and the election. Who cares? Hillary lost. Trump won. Russia was not even a 1% concern. Dems campaigned on it, and have not stopped campaigning on it. It’s so ironic, the Dems used to just absolutely love the Russians. What’s changed?
21 posted on
02/14/2017 8:32:09 PM PST by
Tennessean4Bush
(An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
To: tcrlaf
NYTimes article is click bait, nothing inside
To: tcrlaf
Somebody bring a dictionary over to CNN and have them look at the definition of “constant” contacts. I sincerely doubt it.
24 posted on
02/14/2017 8:32:57 PM PST by
Williams
(Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
To: tcrlaf
according to US officials familiar with the matter.More made up news, actually damn lies.
27 posted on
02/14/2017 8:36:32 PM PST by
cpdiii
(Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson