Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama wanted to be the high-speed rail president. It might be Trump instead.
McClatchy ^ | FEBRUARY 10, 2017 | CURTIS TATE

Posted on 02/11/2017 4:53:52 PM PST by repentant_pundit

Could Donald Trump be the president who brings high-speed rail to America?

The Obama administration spent nearly $10 billion to improve passenger rail service across the country. While it accomplished that goal to some degree, it did not build the faster trains passengers can ride in Europe, Japan and China.

Trains in other countries can travel 200 mph or more, but no train in the United States as yet travels faster than 150 mph. Most go much more slowly than that.

Trump has proposed a $1 trillion investment in U.S. infrastructure, and he has expressed interest in improving roads, bridges, airports and passenger trains.

The subject came up in a White House news conference Friday with Japan’s prime minister, Shinzo Abe.

Through a translator, Abe said Trump would make “major-scale investments” in infrastructure, including high-speed rail.

He said Japanese technology could cut the travel time between Washington and New York to one hour from the current three.

Before a meeting with airline executives on Thursday, Trump had openly lamented the lack of high-speed rail in the United States.

“I don’t want to compete with your business,” Trump said, “but we don’t have one fast train.”

(Excerpt) Read more at mcclatchydc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boondoggle; infrastructure; rail; trains
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
Please no more government Amtrak, or Amtrak on steroids, regardless of POTUS.
1 posted on 02/11/2017 4:53:52 PM PST by repentant_pundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

High speed trains would be massively (and I do mean MASSIVELY) expensive to build and would require NEVER-ENDING MASSIVE SUBSIDIES. Don’t do it, Donald.


2 posted on 02/11/2017 4:57:10 PM PST by House Atreides (Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit
Uh, airplanes go 660 and don't need track maintenance.

The big problem is that one has to butt crack Mecca while dealing with the shoe-Islam thing.

3 posted on 02/11/2017 4:57:13 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

Amtrak on steroids is still Amtrak.


4 posted on 02/11/2017 4:57:53 PM PST by repentant_pundit (Sammy's your uncle, but he behaves like a spoiled rotten baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

Willie Green left us too soon.


5 posted on 02/11/2017 4:58:25 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

Trump to Obama “You didn’t build that”.


6 posted on 02/11/2017 4:59:05 PM PST by BipolarBob (I thought money was burning a hole in my pocket but it was just my Samsung Note 7.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

Glad Obozo failed and hoping Trump rejects the idiocy of this boondoggle. This is nothing more than union appeasement.


7 posted on 02/11/2017 4:59:16 PM PST by Fungi (Every breath, another five thousand fungal spores enter your body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Well, based on the ‘suckess’ of the short runs that have been put in place..................DON’T DO IT!


8 posted on 02/11/2017 4:59:55 PM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

Trump is a businessman. No way he will push the high speed train mantra. It’s a money loser plain and simple. High speed trains are a wet dream of the left. No one else cares.


9 posted on 02/11/2017 5:00:26 PM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

Nooooooo

High speed rail is a boon doogle


10 posted on 02/11/2017 5:02:15 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

High speed rail in the US is idiotic. The government needs to get out it and about a million other things until the debt is paid off.

Actually the government just needs to get out it.


11 posted on 02/11/2017 5:02:55 PM PST by TheTimeOfMan (A time for peace and a time for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

.
High speed rail isn’t really “high speed” and it costs way too much for the tiny benefit it would provide.
.


12 posted on 02/11/2017 5:03:25 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

The leftards and their love for train travel. The fidiots refuse to accept the fact that there are very few population concentrations in the US to warrant it.


13 posted on 02/11/2017 5:04:26 PM PST by x1stcav (Leftism is like rust: It corrodes 24 hours a day until eradicated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

.
Hooterville Trolley to pixley!

Total bullshit.
.


14 posted on 02/11/2017 5:05:51 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

High speed? More like high-priced rail that nobody will ride, and that we’ll ALL pay for for the rest of our lives. If there’s a viable way to transport people by rail that doesn’t lose money, Norfolk & Southern and CSX would be doing it right now.


15 posted on 02/11/2017 5:06:07 PM PST by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

Last thing we need is to link illegal alien metropolis’ together.


16 posted on 02/11/2017 5:07:54 PM PST by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

Oh yeah that 19th century technology is the way to go!


17 posted on 02/11/2017 5:08:02 PM PST by JerryBlackwell (some animals are more equal than others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

It will just give the terrorists (foreign, and domestic) something else to sabotage.


18 posted on 02/11/2017 5:08:48 PM PST by FrankR (You're only enslaved to the extent of the charity that you receive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

It also gives them another place where they can restrict the second amendment.


19 posted on 02/11/2017 5:17:01 PM PST by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: repentant_pundit

If high speed rail is a good idea, private investors will fund it.

Not the tax payer.


20 posted on 02/11/2017 5:22:01 PM PST by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson