Sean Hannity BLASTS #NeverTrump Hacks after POTUS Trump’s SCOTUS Pick

thegatewaypundit ^

[davikkm]

President Donald Trump announced conservative Judge Neil Gorsuch as his pick for the US Supreme Court on Tuesday night.

The pick was widely cheered by conservative and Republican leaders.

But this would not have been possible if the #NeverTrump crowd would have had their way.

Last night Sean Hannity went off on the Trump-hating #NeverTrump crowd of Republicans who fought throughout the year to make sure Donald Trump was defeated.

[JonPreston]

Well done Sean. The #NeverTrump’ers put this nation in grave danger. I’ll never forgive or forget.

[Lurkinanloomin]

They were still drunk on Cruz-Aid.

[oblomov]

Remember, NTers were intent on purging us from the US political sphere after Trump lost.

[867V309]

stabby the clown and his 2 laughing hyena sycophants were doing the sporkweasel snake slither this morning, for the few moments I could stand to listen.

[arthurus]

I see Mark Levin in the collage of NeverTrumpers. He was, is not a NeverTrumper. He was an any-conservative-instead-of-Trumper right up to when Trump became the Nominee. He still doesn't like him but supported his election. His attitude now is to keep the pressure on The Donald to do the right thing. He is still a bit too quick to jump on perceived errors away from the Right but when things work out properly he supports. Levin is more perceptive than most but his bias is to strict Constitutionalism and, while I think that to be admirable normally, we are in a time where the Left has already taken over and owns the entire bureaucracy and thus the culture and the society. As such the Agencies and Departments must be all-but-the first-four be abolished totally or this renaissance will be only a hiatus and the remaining shells of thinned but still extant Bureaus will rise again to choke off the Republic in the next Administration, Democrat or Republican. Historically, two men of Reagan's and Trump's abilities and reforming inclinations do not appear within a few centuries of each other. We have had our share way overfilled in the past fifty years. We have had Reagan and Thatcher(a woman, obviously-pace the Feminists) and John Paul II and now (still only probably) Trump. The likelihood that Trump will be followed by one of like mind and abilities is slim to none. If he does not abolish totally all the Agencies then they will with terror and slaughter return!

[nopardons]

Mark Levin is a stinking load of ego, who isn't and has NEVER been all that...as he imagines himself to be.

He has NO power, and is really just a loud mouthed, irrational, little nothing of a nobody...except to his few remaining drooling sycophants, who are as blind as he is.

[arthurus]

Departments must be all-but-the first-four be abolished totally

and that cannot be done Constitutionally and he will never get tht abolition past the Republicans in Congress. The truth is we elected a dictator, not that that is his inclination necessarily but that it is the fact of the situation. Congress has given its powers over to the Executive and with appointments he will have an ally in the Court but the power resides in the Bureaus and he must first get control of them then abolish them because he cannot give the power back to the Congress and the Congress cannot take it back. The closest to a Constitutional method of getting us bak to where we should be would be a subtly directed Article 5 Convention wherein the States themselves abolish most of the Executive (the Agencies) and take their own Constitutional power back.

[noiseman]

"stabby the clown and his 2 laughing hyena sycophants were doing the sporkweasel snake slither this morning, for the few moments I could stand to listen."

Have they in any way yet admitted that they were wrong about Trump? Like many, I used to be a fan of Beck, but he started losing me when he and his "laughing hyenas" started ridiculing his own listeners, first over Obama's birth certificate issue, and later to a much worse degree in denigrating Trump. I hung in there through the "birther" ridicule, but when they started in on Trump and his supporters, in their trademark juvenile fashion, that was it for me.

Had they simply explained why they disagreed with supporting Trump, that would have been one thing, but to so idiotically charicature Trump and those who supported him was just plain stupid, and an insult to many of their long-time supporters. As Trump would say, "Sad."

[Mr.Unique]

But this would not have been possible if the #NeverTrump crowd would have had their way.

Meaning Trump wouldn't have picked him...so Cruz would have?

I'd rather look at it this way...it's a good pick. Period.

[gogeo]

His attitude now is to keep the pressure on The Donald to do the right thing...

His attitude stinks.

Has he ever once said, "Well done, Mr. Trump," or "Thank you, Mr. Trump?"

There were no other candidate in the field that would allow us to discuss what we're discussing now, IE winning.

[Bellflower]

Good for you Sean, keep telling them. Don’t let them forget. I like your bulldog attitude!

[gogeo]

The truth is we elected a dictator

Pretty inflammatory statement. Make your case.

[Conserv]

During and since the election, Hannity has been quite feisty... and I like it!

Also, Trump seems to like him.

[faucetman]

“.....Levin is more perceptive than most but his bias is to strict Constitutionalism ........”

I have said it before that to these people, “Conservatism” is a religion. Cultish even.

Back during the primaries, I couldn’t understand how the #NeverTrumpers hated Trump when everything he said were things conservatives should have LOVED!

He wan’t a “card carrying” member of the conservative club/cult. Club/Cult membership meant more to them than policies.

F them. WE WON. I can’t stop smiling! I LOVE winning.

[arthurus]

I have made my case numerous times to much strident flaming. You might possible go back and read the rest of the post to which you have made reply. It is not as extensive a description as I have made many times elsewhere but it shows the picture.

[Joe 6-pack]

"Meaning Trump wouldn't have picked him...so Cruz would have?"

Nope. Because Cruz would have lost the general. Hillary would have been announcing her nominee last night had she faced Cruz on November 8th.

[arthurus]

You find points of disagreement with Mr. Levin, right? It is all the fashion, especially on the left but among freepers, too, to get all tight jawed with quivering hatred for someone who has a bit of a different approachs. You can’t even accept that he did say vote for Trump and avoid Mrs Bill and has been supportive of the things Trump has said and done that have gone well. His reservations are as skepticism until he sees what happens. That is never a bad outlook.

[gogeo]

I see nothing but blah blah and assertions.

[nopardons]

Look, you've been here a long time; well, so have I and I found many areas of disagreement with Mark, over a DECADE ago, especially when he started throwing tantrums, when I corrected him, instead of bowing before him, drooling, and kissing his arse. And yes, I was correct, he was dead wrong, and you can check the archives, if you wish.

You're assuming a lot of things about me, heaping uncalled for aspersions, and filtering it all through your benighted bias in favor of someone who doesn't deserve your undying loyalty.

You just refuse to understand that anyone here, ANYONE, would deny the all great and *cough*powerful*cough* OZ, their obeisance. Well.......TOUGH; LIVE WITH IT; OLD MARKY IS A POS!