Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge halts Trump’s Muslim ban
Think Progress (don't know about them) ^ | January 28, 2017 | Judd Legum

Posted on 01/28/2017 6:16:38 PM PST by Hostage

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Yes he did and so did FDR...but from different nations!

That judge needs to be fired.

41 posted on 01/28/2017 6:34:10 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

Congress should impeach this judge. We need to stop this judicial activism - cold


42 posted on 01/28/2017 6:34:21 PM PST by datricker (Its America in America Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hostage; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; TWhiteBear; WildHighlander57; Velveeta; Sal; ...

.

43 posted on 01/28/2017 6:34:26 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

This judge is clearly a racist for opposing our President.


44 posted on 01/28/2017 6:34:54 PM PST by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana
Unfortunately, several posters keep posting threads using that source, this past week.

They should all be banned !

45 posted on 01/28/2017 6:35:30 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Castigar

Supreme Court Justice Taney tried to overrule Lincoln’s suspension of Habeas Corpus.
His order was ignored.
Trump could simply order ICE to find these birds, return them to the nearest airport and march them to a jet.


46 posted on 01/28/2017 6:36:29 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers, all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie; admin

Dude, seriously. It’s no where. This is fake news.

Admin can u pull this progressive post of a lie. Look at the source used


47 posted on 01/28/2017 6:37:01 PM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Thats the way I see it too.

Those that aint left yet cant come and aint getten in.

CNN MSNBC are squealing what a defeat this is...I don’t think so as a handful cant be returned.Those that arrived today.

Theres a lot more that aint getten in and thats the plan.

Not a problem.


48 posted on 01/28/2017 6:37:09 PM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
It should be obvious to all what the end game is here.

This is going to be fast-tracked to the Supreme Court so the Democrats can make this the fight over Trump's SCOTUS nomination next week.

Trump needs to think about pacing this to protect the nomination of his SCOTUS pick, or the Democrats will hold the Supreme Court hostage to immigration policy.

McConnell is already surrendering the Senate on filibusters; Democrats now know he will be weak even with full Republican control of the Federal government.

This is an "all in" moment for Trump, but this is not the pot to go all in for. Trump needs a tactical retreat here while he reorganizes his strategy to protect his SCOTUS nominee. He also needs to review his relationship with McConnell and start quickly thinking about a succession plan for Senate Majority Leader.

-PJ

49 posted on 01/28/2017 6:39:04 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Hard to believe that Trump wouldn’t have anticipated this and have a counter ready. It’s going to be interesting to see what he has planned.


50 posted on 01/28/2017 6:39:49 PM PST by Ronin (Blackface or bolt-ons, it's the same fraud. - Norm Lenhart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

There’s the nuclear option, so the filibuster is out of the window.


51 posted on 01/28/2017 6:40:34 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

The stay is temporary and a court will have to decide whether to make it permanent at a later date—and it only affects people who have already arrived in the United States or are currently in transit

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/01/muslim-ban-federal-court


52 posted on 01/28/2017 6:40:36 PM PST by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HollyB
reality sucks, I know
53 posted on 01/28/2017 6:40:50 PM PST by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68

The stay is temporary and a court will have to decide whether to make it permanent at a later date—and it only affects people who have already arrived in the United States or are currently in transit

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/01/muslim-ban-federal-court


54 posted on 01/28/2017 6:41:46 PM PST by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Hostage; All

but the Judges didn’t have a problem with it when CARTER did it...


55 posted on 01/28/2017 6:44:00 PM PST by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Mother Jones, “Piss Hole in the snow Eyes”, David Corn. Good conservative news source


56 posted on 01/28/2017 6:45:14 PM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

But aren’t these specific nations not friendly anyway? Come on!


57 posted on 01/28/2017 6:45:19 PM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Here is the link to the text of the stay:

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3436642/EDNY-Motion-to-Stay-Removal.pdf


58 posted on 01/28/2017 6:45:26 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Doesn’t matter — this emboldens these idiots. Wait until these mayors defy Trumps sanctuary cities EO...


59 posted on 01/28/2017 6:46:02 PM PST by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

As I wrote on GAB, A terrorist supporting federal judge who blocked Trumps ban of Muslims is in direct violation of the Supreme court in UNITED STATES v. VALENZUELA-BERNAL, (1982) and needs to be impeached for, at minimum, incompetence.

“The power to regulate immigration—an attribute of sovereignty essential to the preservation of any nation—has been entrusted by the Constitution to the political branches of the Federal Government.”

The Court, “without exception”, called this power “plenary,” empowering the Presidential prerogative as expressly delegated by Congress, with the right to “make rules for the admission of aliens.”

The Congress carved out protection only for a limited class of aliens: those who qualify for an immigrant visa. Even here, the only limits are race, sex, nationality, but no limits on the presidential power to exclude based on religion, terror designations, poor vetting documentation or anything that can be called a matter of “procedure.” All refugees can be legally excluded. All Muslims can be legally excluded. All Sharia law supporters can be legally excluded.

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/458/858.html


60 posted on 01/28/2017 6:46:05 PM PST by Mechanicos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson