Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Nope. Because it would be Americans paying for the wall.


3 posted on 01/26/2017 12:49:30 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants
Nope. Because it would be Americans paying for the wall.

This is just the start. Trump wants higher import taxes on everything. So get used to paying more for everything so the unions get more jobs.

13 posted on 01/26/2017 12:53:38 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

It’s a cost to Americans only if it affects the end cost the consumer in America pays.

Some products have to priced based on their competition.

You can add 6000 in border tax to a 30,000 auto, but that doesn’t mean consumers will choose the 36,000 auto over the 30,000 one.


17 posted on 01/26/2017 12:55:18 PM PST by xzins (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

True, but this is all just negotiating Kabuki.
Heck, with our breathless media the wall may be paid for from extra popcorn sales.


23 posted on 01/26/2017 12:57:24 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

And just maybe some of those American companies that moved their plants to Mexico will eventually come back. And some of those 96 million Americans not counted as unemployed but unemployed nonetheless will get jobs.


25 posted on 01/26/2017 12:59:03 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

It is a Wall Tax that US-made business have already paid.


51 posted on 01/26/2017 1:21:35 PM PST by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Not if we simply short the Mexican Government in the foreign aid we provide them in sufficient an amount to cover the wall and it's staffing and upkeep. There will still be enough for them to get their corrupt greedy little hands upon.
70 posted on 01/26/2017 1:37:24 PM PST by ExSoldier ("Terrorists: They hate you yesterday, today, and tomorrow. End it, no more tomorrows for them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I am paying out the a$$ for everything anyway for everyone and getting nothing in return for it.

May as well pay a little more (not that I believe that will be the end result) and get a big, shiny, wall in return.

72 posted on 01/26/2017 1:43:11 PM PST by riri (Obama's Amerika--Not a fun place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Nope. Because it would be Americans paying for the wall.

How do you know the Mexican producers won't lower their prices an equivalent amount in order to keep the prices of their goods competitive? If we put a tax of $1,000 on some Mexican products, and the producers lower their prices by $1,000 in order not to lose a sale, the US government will get the $1,000 and someone in Mexico will lose the same amount and the US consumer will not be affected.

That seems just as likely to happen as some blanket statement that the producers will never lower their prices and the US consumers will simply pay 20% more.

78 posted on 01/26/2017 1:56:28 PM PST by Wissa (Few men desire liberty. Most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Because it would be Americans paying for the wall.

I've never read Art of the Deal, but if there's a chapter about how to get people to pay a bill while making them think someone else is paying it, I will.

81 posted on 01/26/2017 2:02:54 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants; SeekAndFind; AdmSmith; DoughtyOne; All

We import a lot of our winter food from Mexico, and 20% will hurt low income families the most. They already suffer from diets low in fruits and vegetables. A much better idea would be to charge from 2% to 7% for money sent by illegal aliens to Mexico and elsewhere. There are any number of ways that the wall could be paid for. Years ago I had a friend from India. He said he was only allowed to take $10,000 out of the country. I don’t remember if there was a significant fee for taking out larger amounts. But there should have been.


129 posted on 01/26/2017 5:08:34 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Americans will pay the bill but Americans will also get the jobs, which is much better and worth the extra cost...so yes hit Mexico with 20 percent....maybe they will learn the cost of doing biz with drug cartels isn’t worth it now....in the era of Trump.


173 posted on 01/27/2017 12:16:35 AM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants; SeekAndFind

>Nope. Because it would be Americans paying for the wall.

Call it a wash; less illegals in country = +security\+wages\-welfare\+workers = more $\taxes = ....


220 posted on 01/27/2017 12:44:40 PM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson