Wouldn’t that be charitable taking?
When talking of this, we should talk about the taking. That’s 90% of the operation.
(comments not directed at you, but at the graphic)
This wasn’t about charitable giving at all.
PAY to play, isn’t about charitable giving.
I wonder how plans are going for that second home near the Clintons.
(Sniffle) poverty, chronic illness, homelessness, children at risk, dying elephants (Chelsea's fave), environmental dangers.....all gone....all a thing of the past (sob).
============================================
Isn't that odd? Billy was president 8 years. Hillary as First Lady eight years then a US Senator for eight years....and Secy of State for four years.
Even "Tee me Obama" noticed that all of their really great accomplishments....saving people's lives, fighting disease.... happened only when they had a foundation.
Even more significantly, all of the global goodness happened at the same time the Clintons got filthy rich accepting donations from foreigners, countries, and various entities......even a Baptist Church in Cameroon.
(Just a coincidence, I'm sure) that companies doing business before the State Department, got lucrative favors from Hillary AND AT THE SAME TIME donated to the foundation.
Somebody please get me a Kleenex.
I think a lot of “charities” are like this. When the majority of money goes “elsewhere”.
I am reminded of the hour-long “preaching” infomercial that runs every single night, 7 days a week. Lots good Gospel singing for about 1/2 hour, some reasonably-solid Bible teaching for about an hour and then 1/2 hour of send in your money - $1000 or more. Sometimes it’s the magic $273 amount.
7. Days. A. Week.
Of course they never really explain WHAT they’re doing with the $100 million dollars a year or so that they raise. The guy behind it has a $4+ million dollar house that he built on Indian land.
I’m all for people giving to God and the furthering of the Gospel. We were also warned about those just in it for the money, fleecing the flock.