Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California's bullet train is hurtling toward a multibillion-dollar overrun...
latimes.com ^ | Ralph Vartabedian

Posted on 01/13/2017 1:38:01 PM PST by BenLurkin

California’s bullet train could cost taxpayers 50% more than estimated — as much as $3.6 billion more. And that’s just for the first 118 miles through the Central Valley, which was supposed to be the easiest part of the route between Los Angeles and San Francisco.

A confidential Federal Railroad Administration risk analysis, obtained by The Times, projects that building bridges, viaducts, trenches and track from Merced to Shafter could cost $9.5 billion to $10 billion, compared with the original budget of $6.4 billion.

The federal document outlines far-reaching management problems: significant delays in environmental planning, lags in processing invoices for federal grants and continuing failures to acquire needed property.

The California High-Speed Rail Authority had originally anticipated completing the Central Valley track by this year, but the federal risk analysis estimates that that won’t happen until 2024, placing the project seven years behind schedule.

...

Proponents of the project, including many veteran transportation experts, have said that California’s massive economy can handle higher costs for the project — even more than $100 billion — by increasing sales taxes or making firm commitments for additional future funding from the state’s general fund.

But the Legislature has already balked at giving the rail authority the ability to borrow against future state revenues, saying it would have to make do with existing allocations. And that was before Gov. Jerry Brown warned on Tuesday that California’s projected 2017-18 budget shows a $1.6 billion deficit.

Proponents say short-term financial concerns are more than offset by the future value of a transportation system connecting the state.

Brown, meanwhile, has sought to shield the project from interference. He vetoed a bill with bipartisan support in September that would have increased oversight of the project and clarified estimates of how much the project will cost.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: California
KEYWORDS: boondoggle; bullettrain; highspeedrail; rail
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 01/13/2017 1:38:01 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

As if they didn’t plan this all along.


2 posted on 01/13/2017 1:39:12 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

3 posted on 01/13/2017 1:39:50 PM PST by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

EASY FIX:

Moonbeam and the Legislature just need to Pass a Law Mandating ALL PUBLIC EMPLOYEES Statewide exclusively use Public Transportation to and from their respective workplaces, the Massive EXTRA Revenue Generated can be used to Fund the Train to Nowhere.


4 posted on 01/13/2017 1:41:37 PM PST by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

A 50% overrun would be a bargain. This train will cost at least 3 times the estimates. The whole states economics are to be hijacked for the sake of union pensions and that is the whole story in one sentence.


5 posted on 01/13/2017 1:41:46 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

California...please...please...seceede.....please!


6 posted on 01/13/2017 1:42:04 PM PST by Don Corleone (.leave the gun, take the canolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

And they plan to secede in the middle of all this?


7 posted on 01/13/2017 1:42:21 PM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NohSpinZone

They would have been better off creating very large cigarette boats and built docks along the coastline. People can board in San Diego and ride up to San Francisco in a couple of hours. Being that it is not off shore people wouldn’t have to worry about big waves.


8 posted on 01/13/2017 1:42:30 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (CNN - The Chicken Noodle Network)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

pull the plug

investigate Sacramento

this is a boondogle


9 posted on 01/13/2017 1:43:13 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Well, based on not being concerned about pension liabilities in the 100s of billions, preparing both turn away federal funds, financing fighting the feds in doomed efforts, launching their own satellites, paying massive self-inflicted AGW taxes and stampeding capital to other states, California must have NO financial problems whatsoever.


10 posted on 01/13/2017 1:46:51 PM PST by freedumb2003 (obozo: not just the worst president in American history - worst *American* in American history (turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Public transport in Paris is now used to constrain people, to make them dependent on gov transport.


11 posted on 01/13/2017 1:47:51 PM PST by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

This is California, a one-party state.

They would never pull the plug, and for it to happen there would have to be a split in the Democrat ranks with a contingent that went against it.

Unlikely to happen.

What this is for is to carry illegal aliens up and down the Central Valley and from Southern California. They should call it the illegal express.

Ultimately it will link stations throughout Mexico.


12 posted on 01/13/2017 1:49:09 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
according to Bent Flyvbjerg, an infrastructure risk expert at the University of Oxford

Most alliterative name EVER!

13 posted on 01/13/2017 1:50:21 PM PST by freedumb2003 (obozo: not just the worst president in American history - worst *American* in American history (turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

“They would have been better off creating very large cigarette boats and built docks along the coastline. People can board in San Diego and ride up to San Francisco in a couple of hours. Being that it is not off shore people wouldn’t have to worry about big waves.”

The driving distance is 500 miles. It would take 10 hours or longer by sea.


14 posted on 01/13/2017 1:50:29 PM PST by BJ1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

The purpose of ANY public works project is to put money in motion so that it can be stolen. If money sits in a stack, and tomorrow the stack is thinner than it is today, then it is easy to determine that some of it has been pilfered.

Put that money in motion, start passing it from account to account, person to person, agency to company, and there are unlimited opportunities for it to be stolen through bribes, bill padding, extortion, campaign contributions, community groups, etc.

If at the end of the process something useful accidentally gets built and the public benefits, just know that that that was completely incidental.


15 posted on 01/13/2017 1:51:10 PM PST by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

No need to secede. We’re on the fast track to oblivion via self-immolation. The only question is, what will rise from the ashes?


16 posted on 01/13/2017 1:51:34 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

And who didn’t see this coming from the inception?


17 posted on 01/13/2017 1:52:10 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

And who didn’t see this coming from the inception?


18 posted on 01/13/2017 1:52:15 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Seriously. Of course, what they should have used the billions for is to either repair the current reservoirs or build new ones including desalinization plants. Expensive but worth the investment in this state.


19 posted on 01/13/2017 1:52:26 PM PST by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Secede. If you use too many ‘e’s you will run out.


20 posted on 01/13/2017 1:53:29 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson