5 years prior to this incident member of MS-13 from El Salvador killed the entire family of a San Francisco woman:
the tax paying dad and his 2 law abiding boys went out to bring home a pizza and in a very brief traffic altercation were all shot to death by this insect, who was protected against deportation by the laws of the city of San Francisco.
I’d like to know how they and their daughter voted. I can guess.
The city is to blame for letting the illegal criminal go free. The ranger was stupid for leaving his weapon in an unlocked car, but that act did not make the guy steal the gun and murder a woman with it. Under that reasoning victims of crime can be blamed for a lot of things.
I also hope the idiot judge gets overturned. What a terrible story this is—the needless death of a beautiful young woman whose last words were ‘Help me, daddy’. Breaks my heart.
Her family’s life will never be normal again, just as Pat Smith’s life will never be normal again.
And we can trace all of this heartbreak and loss back to the same source: liberals.
You’re right. Real America finally had enough of this kind of suffering and took our country back in November.
Re-file the suit against San Francisco with a different judge.
U.S. Magistrate Joseph Spero dismissed the parents’ claims against the city of San Francisco, which had released Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez from custody less than three months before the shooting without notifying immigration authorities.
...
States don’t have to help enforce federal laws. That’s part of state’s rights. But SF will end up paying big if it remains a sanctuary for illegal aliens.
I’d like to see a legal analysis based on precedents.
Like it or not, the attractive nuisance liability doctrine has been around for decades now.
And it even has echoes in Old Testament custom, such as the liability if somebody falls off your roof that didn’t have a proper wall. It doesn’t add up to murder, but it isn’t negligible negligence either.
I fear that fallacies of the excluded middle are being bandied about here.
But anyhow, arguments by label (”libtard”) should and do fail. This is what we would expect from a system of impartial principles. Sometimes the blind squirrel finds a nut before it. That is a valid nut.
Thanks for the post. After reading this article I find myself infuriated and scratching my head at this judge’s logic, or should I say lack thereof. How can the City of San Francisco not be liable after this maggots release due to an ordinance is beyond belief. The fact that this judge cited a California law which allows a victim to sue the owner of a car used in the commission of a crime because the car was stolen with the keys in it defies description. This asinine decision will undoubtedly be reversed upon appeal when brought before a judge who has some semblance of sanity. This brings me to another point. The judge stated that San Francisco had this release policy in place and that they were not legally obligated to inform immigration officials about his release. That has to change. One of President Trump’s first bills he signs into law should be a bill that outlaws “sanctuary cities” and compels any law enforcement agency to inform ICE upon the detention of any and all illegal aliens. This senseless bloodshed has to stop.
Congress must fix the law so in the future sanctuary cities can be sued
White woman killed by savage illegal thug? Inconvenient for San Fran.
But if Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez were to shoot the seal he said he was aiming at San Fran would be in an uproar.