Posted on 01/06/2017 7:54:14 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda
Hmmm... Looking....still not seeing it.
More study is obviously required...
The ‘rats can’t seem to rip their hands from this tar baby now.
Snake Oil and Banjo Salve.
Lots of innuendo there, eh?
I absolutely believe that Russia has hacked the DNC, and the Clinton foundation. Their security sucked to say the least. For god’s sake podesta’s password was p@ssw0rd.
I also believe they released nothing. If Hillary had of won and Putin had all the information of corruption he would have owned President Hillary Clinton.
Hillary’s home grown secret sever had all the info relative the secretary of state and the Clinton Foundation. Nothing has been released about the Clinton Foundation’s Corruption. If Putin wanted to destroy Clinton this information would have been released.
Nothing has come out except that relating to the DNC. Yes the DNC was hacked probably by Russia and many others. Russia released nothing as this would destroy their blackmail against President Hillary Clinton.
The hack was probably internal to the DNC, probably a Bernie Sanders supporter.
When wikileaks published the DNC information I suspect Putin was very unhappy. I think he said, “I own that bitch and hope she wins.”
Dude, get it through you’re head: We all know RT is Russian propaganda but sourcing out a report from 2012 and conflating the normal propaganda every government including ours does with rigging an election is a farce.
Oh! Now I see it. Geez, how did I miss that? ;-)
They know Putin’s actions and motives, but could not determine why Hillary put a classified server in a bathroom closet ? We need the men in the white coats now for the men in black.
Distractions are so distracting.
Yes I did...Quite Frankly I really don’t believe much of anything I read anymore. My wife gets all upset at the news and I tell her to turn in off and put on music to soothe the soul.
Of course the Russians did it - she only gave then 20% of the US uranium supply when they expected 30%, and only transferred some of the latest military, bio, chip technologies they expected.
The Russians paid the Clintons good money for these deals which Hillary only partially filled. Such insults do not go unanswered. They had to show her who’s who as their reputation for bad guys was at stake here.
Of course, CNN is blaming the whole affair on DJT - even alluding that he may have directly requested Putin come to his aid - since everyone agreed he had no chance short of a ‘miracle’ of winning the election. As Putin has lucrative business deals and connections to DJT, he did as asked or told depending on which CNN anchor is spouting. Thus, the ‘miracle’ and DJTs illegitimate win. All heil ... hail HRC!
More BS from LIBERAL MSM outlets.
...”No evidence was presented to back up that conclusion, with officials saying that information had to remain secret.”...
This is why the majority of Americans believe Putin more than our politicized government officials. The timing of this smells way too much to ignore. The Democrats and the “never Trumper GOPers” desperately need a cause outside of themselves as to why they lost the election. The old truth stands..Repeat a lie long enough and before long it becomes embedded as truth. Did you hear how the Washington Post retracted the recent fake stories they put out. Their retraction was such that it reached only a small percentage of readers that the lie reached. Clever, huh?
CIA, FBI and National Security Agency.....Curly, Moe and Larry, HAHAHAHA Every other news post says there is no evidence.
So somehow our intelligence community feels the need to point out that media sources are "biased". Presumably they recognize that all news sources are "biased", and that pointing out that RT presents biased news is no more relevant than pointing out that the Washington Post, or the New York Times, or CNN, or the BBC, or for that matter Voice of America put a particular slant on what they report and their opinions.
And the same intelligence community devotes pages of their report on Russian "hacking" to showing, using recycled information from 2012, that RT is pro Russian, and against a lot of ideas -- including by the way the ideas of the people who voted for Trump.
And from that they allegedly concluded that Russia was trying to influence the election since they criticized Hillary Clinton more than Donald Trump.
I hope you can see that from an analysis point of view their methods appear to be amateur at best. A high school student who put forward articles from 2012 to support an argument that in 2016 some group took a particular course of action would get a D on their paper.
In this case the report deserves a "D", for Democratic Party propaganda.
Lol! Thanks! That's pretty funny. Do you have a background in comedy?
And that the day-by-day, hour-by-hour reporting, the lies, innuendo and misquotes of and about Trump, which was in both coverage hours and accusations, far worse about Trump than ANYTHING the Russians MIGHT have discovered thru hacking about Hillary.
And the BEST part? That a sizable chunk of the country DIDN'T fall for the ridiculous propaganda the media pushed about Trump!
“The 25-page report prepared by the CIA, FBI and National Security Agency...”
Probably done in crayon by political appointees without professional staff input or agreement.
And it drove the left to the brink of psychosis!
No matter what Trump said - no matter how viciously he was attacked by the leftstream industrial complex, his voters remained resolute and at his side.
Remember when he joked that he could shoot someone in the street and not lose a single supporter? He was right! The left could not come to grips with the simple fact that half the country was voting as if their lives depended on it, and that no petty foibles on Trump's part were going to sway us from supporting him.
The fact that most lefties are STILL trying to figure out what just happened, is proof positive that they've ignored us for decades, and are in complete mystery over the motivations of half the population in their own country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.