To: SeekAndFind
To: Cold War Veteran - Submarines
I took a quick scan through that report, and I couldn't find anything that I would consider "hacking" by any measure. The fact that they spend so much time detailing Russia's propaganda efforts on Russian television is very telling. How does that qualify as interference in the U.S. election? LOL.
16 posted on
01/06/2017 1:33:48 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
To: Cold War Veteran - Submarines
"RTs coverage of Secretary Clinton throughout the US presidential campaign was consistently negative and focused on her leaked e-mails and accused her of corruption, poor physical and mental health, and ties to Islamic extremism. "
Spot on. What's the problem with that?
30 posted on
01/06/2017 1:44:08 PM PST by
Paladin2
(No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
To: Cold War Veteran - Submarines
144 posted on
01/07/2017 5:19:55 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Cold War Veteran - Submarines
Gee whiz.... I feel like I am on-staff at the NY Times or at Wikileaks.....better yet, I could be on McCain's staff and be the designated courier to the Control-Left media.
152 posted on
01/07/2017 3:14:13 PM PST by
ptsal
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson