Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton’s Controversies, Not Donald Trump’s, Dominated Twitter In 2016
The Huffington Post ^ | January 3, 2017 | Natalie Jackson

Posted on 01/03/2017 3:35:02 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Trump was all over the news, but Clinton’s scandals — or “scandals” — owned Twitter. There’s no question that Donald Trump dominated media coverage during the 2016 campaign....

But on Twitter, it was a different story.

Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time as SoS, ... and subsequent WikiLeaks releases that targeted her campaign and the Democratic Party, dominated Twitter discussions about the presidential election during 2016, according to a study put out by the data and polling firm Echelon Insights. (Echelon -founded .. run by a Republican pollster and strategist.)

Echelon compiled data from nearly 2 billion tweets about major news stories in 2016,... They tracked tweets that mentioned candidates [or] election-related controversies. Trump was the candidate mentioned more often, but it was Clinton’s issues that took center stage among the controversies.-snip-

ECHELON INSIGHTS [seriously summarized for brevity]

Clinton Email hacks & WikiLeaks = 33 million Tweets

Clinton's Private Email Server = 21 million Tweets

Clinton calling Trump supporters a “basket of deplorables” = 6 million Tweets

Trump's infamous 'Access Hollywood' tape = 5.2 million Tweets

... Did Clinton’s controversies generate so much attention on Twitter because people were defending her? Or was all the attention negative?

It might not matter. ...simply keeping those controversies alive likely guaranteed that they’d be on voters’ minds all the way through Election Day. There was probably no clearer example of this than FBI director James Comey reviving the private email server issue within days of the election.

Trump’s issues, on the other hand, seemed to blow over well before Election Day. That was undoubtedly helpful in his path to victory.

(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintonnonnews; cnn; deplorables; election2016; emails; emailserver; hillary; huffingtoncompost; huffingtonpost; huffpo; mediawingofthednc; msm; nataliejackson; partisanmediashills; trump; tweets; twitter; wikileaks
The Eschelon has good information on Twitter that was overlapped with HuffPo's opinions that can be read at the source.

The bottom line is Clinton was sinking in a quagmire of deceit and lies that people discussed.

The MSM couldn't control the access of Twitter news to ignore, spin, and lie for Hillary Clinton.

And Clinton's illegal dealings and deceit are really much more than just 'scandals.'

1 posted on 01/03/2017 3:35:02 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Lock her up


2 posted on 01/03/2017 3:37:49 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

And the harder the destructionists tried to play the moral equivalence game (see! Trump has bad things too!) the more people saw through their idiot level crap and then went to read up on Hillary’s (and the destructionist left) actual bad acts.

So, I’m gonna guess that Huffpoo’s reasoned advice is to double down on the stupid and cheer on as the destructionists dig their grave hole even deeper.


3 posted on 01/03/2017 3:43:22 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

The media expressed outraged that emails were leaked.

The voters were outraged by the content of the leaked emails.

That’s the difference.


4 posted on 01/03/2017 3:50:25 PM PST by samtheman (I REALLY hope Trump reads FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy

They didn’t actually double-down. They allude to defending her kept her negative business in the news for too long.

There was so much Clinton negative, they had no choice but to try and defend her.

Funny how none of this mentioned tweets on CGI, Bill the rapist, or Abedin-Weiner. I bet there’s more to the research and HuffPo cherry-picked.


5 posted on 01/03/2017 3:57:02 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies (Happy New Year -'45 will be the best ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Grimmy; BenLurkin; samtheman

Directly from the source of Eschelon:

More than half of the 10 most-tweeted-about stories were about political or election-related issues or, more commonly, about the politicians themselves.

“Trump consistently accounted for about 40% to 60% of the share of candidate mentions for the majority of the year leading up to the election, even during the primaries,” the blog notes. “Most of the time, this was roughly double that of Hillary Clinton’s share of mentions.”

IOW, Hillary did NOT dominate.

10 most-tweeted-about stories of 2016

1. Donald Trump
2. Hillary Clinton
3. Barack Obama
4. Bernie Sanders
5. WikiLeaks/Hacking
6. China
7. Ted Cruz
8. Cubs/World Series
9. Iraq/ISIS
10. Dakota Access Pipeline


6 posted on 01/03/2017 4:06:13 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies (Happy New Year -'45 will be the best ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

https://medium.com/echelon-indicators/the-year-in-news-2016-41f876d4c618?source=user_profile-————1—————

Voter Fraud 4.7 million

Abedin/Weiner 3.7 million

Fake News 3.3 million

Hillary’s Health 2.7 million


7 posted on 01/03/2017 4:13:47 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies (Happy New Year -'45 will be the best ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

I was turn first to Huffington Post for news - or “news” -


8 posted on 01/03/2017 4:19:17 PM PST by Optimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Imo, they are actually doubling down on the stupid.

They’re doing anything they can to keep from admitting that their hand picked leaders are degenerate, filthy, career criminal scumbags and that they, the mindless drones who follow those scumbags are beneath contempt themselves.

Until they can do that honestly and abjectly, they’ll just keep digging that grave hole deeper and deeper.


9 posted on 01/03/2017 5:12:05 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Yep. That’s how you can tell who’s a patriot.


10 posted on 01/03/2017 5:59:06 PM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson