Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Team Floats ‘Public-Private’ Veterans Health Care
breitbart.com ^ | 12/29/2016 | Charlie Spiering

Posted on 12/29/2016 7:58:46 AM PST by rktman

President-elect Donald Trump met with health care executives on Wednesday to begin a serious reform of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

“I’ve been saying we have to take care of our vets,” Trump told reporters at Mar-a-Lago after the meetings. “We are working on something to make it great for our veterans, because they are treated very, very unfairly.”

Trump met with John Noseworthy, the President and CEO of Mayo Clinic, Paul Rothman, the CEO of Johns Hopkins Medicine as well as Dr. Bruce Moskowitz, Dr. David Torchiana of Partners HealthCare and Toby Cosgrove of Cleveland Clinic, according to the press pool. He also met with Marc Sherman of restructuring firm Alvarez & Marsal.

According to a Trump transition official speaking to the press, the president-elect wanted to know more about giving more options to veterans and allowing them to go to any hospital of their choice.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: coverage; privatization; trumptransition; trumpveterans; va; veterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Plenty of big bucks for refugees but Vets.....Meh! So, as I recall, when my Dad swore me in back in '67, there were no caveats for what I was doing. No special clauses as to what I may or may not do if I found something I didn't care for. I don't know if I was promised VA benefits or not but assume they were available. So, 45 years later I found myself in need of some assistance for a medical issue and the hoops I had to jump through were ridiculous. Initally I was denied but through some maneuvering finally managed to get in and got my issue resolved. I believe at one time there was even "means testing" before you could get any care from them. We didn't "means test" when we went in. As far as I'm concerned, if you served, you get covered. Not everybody went to a combat zone depending on your MOS and the needs of the military at the time. But, at any minute, you could be placed in a life threatening situation and you agreed that you would do that without question. So, pony up Govt.
1 posted on 12/29/2016 7:58:46 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

Exactly so..................


2 posted on 12/29/2016 8:00:34 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I figure the reason Trump is taking his time on the VA appointment is to make sure it is tightly linked with the plans for overhauling/repealing Obamacare. Nothing should be a higher priority for the federal government than taking care of our vets. (In other words, it should be right up there with Congressional perks /s)


3 posted on 12/29/2016 8:09:32 AM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Get rid of it and sell of the assets..

Go to regular hospitals


4 posted on 12/29/2016 8:11:07 AM PST by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

He’s talking to the people who handle large scale operations

It’s not a horrible idea


5 posted on 12/29/2016 8:12:00 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“As far as I’m concerned, if you served, you get covered.”

Not so, and it’s never been that way and that intent was never there.

The VA has 8 priority levels. Anyone who is 50% or greater disabled with a service connected disability is Priority 1. A vet with no service connected disability is Priority 8. And yes, they would have to be indigent, or nearly so, to receive VA care.


6 posted on 12/29/2016 8:13:34 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Does COBRA still exist? Is it any good?


7 posted on 12/29/2016 8:14:33 AM PST by A Navy Vet (I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Plus LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Just a thought...I think we need MANY small community hospitals, serviced totally by military docs and nurses...and with access to major hospitals for extraordinary treatments. Or something along this line.


8 posted on 12/29/2016 8:14:43 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

yep, give vets a “Cadillac” health care plan paid for by the Feds and it will cost a fraction of what the VA costs now and be 100% more efficient.

$182.3 BILLION we pay for the VA annually could buy the Vets one heck of a private insurance plan.


9 posted on 12/29/2016 8:15:16 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("The political class is a bureaucracy designed to perpetuate itself" Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Tricare for active duty and retirees.
Tricare for life for retirees over 65.

Start up a new offshoot:
Tricare for veterans.

Structures, contracts and processes already exist and work.


10 posted on 12/29/2016 8:15:22 AM PST by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The good news is that they are NOT discussing full privatization.

There are some things only the VA does well.

TBI, PTSD and advanced prosthetics are 3.


11 posted on 12/29/2016 8:16:17 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
Does COBRA still exist? Is it any good?

Costs a lot every month depending on the state and your income.

12 posted on 12/29/2016 8:16:41 AM PST by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Well you probably need the assets, just for capacity reasons. So sell them (or give them) to private hospital operators as part of the restructuring of the VA. No more separate facilities makes sense to me. It’s not needed.


13 posted on 12/29/2016 8:17:15 AM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Then change it. I barely squeeked in to the Level 8 position. I didn’t need much just a break on a med that without outside insurance was going to be $4,000.00/mth. With insurance, a measly $1,400/mth. At level 8 it costs me $8.00/mth. Even if I liquidated all my meager assets, I’d have been able to sustain the med for a few months. One caveat of course is an honorable discharge.


14 posted on 12/29/2016 8:18:57 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Maybe I'm thinking of Tri-Care. Think COBRA is a program for those who lose their jobs, but can continue with the same insurance on their dime. Or did Obamacare do away with COBRA?

It's been so long since I've had to worry about med insurance. After leaving active duty, I had my own company with Blue Cross. Since retired, been on the Wife's Blue Cross plan.

15 posted on 12/29/2016 8:20:11 AM PST by A Navy Vet (I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Plus LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

When I got laid off/retired there was a COBRA transition available but YUGELY expensive for limited coverage and not for long term.


16 posted on 12/29/2016 8:20:45 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

The military does not staff enough military physicians for their own needs, let alone staffing hospitals across the nation.


17 posted on 12/29/2016 8:25:59 AM PST by dangerdoc ((this space for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Why can’t veterans simply be issued a health care card, good anywhere, for anything, and be done with it?

Free health care for “immigrants,” felony trash of every sort, trannies, psychos and scoundrel congressmen (but I repeat myself), yet nothing but paper and delays and f-ups for vets?

B.S.!!!


18 posted on 12/29/2016 8:35:26 AM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

As I’ve said on other threads, the government unions will fight this privatization tooth and nail. Already are...


19 posted on 12/29/2016 8:40:34 AM PST by donozark (Attention Bella and Gigi Hadid: PLEASE stop fighting over me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

If they are using the term “public-private” the way it is typically used, read the fine print and more than once. Politically, “public-private” is fascism with a smile. Economically, it is crony capitalism pure and simple.

The terms and conditions for “public-private partnerships” between business and government need to be rethought. If you want to see the abuses on full display, just take a closer look at common core and SBAC. Talk about revolving doors and conflict of interest! - In one respect, “public private” is just another layer of legal protection against the public harm they can cause. Accountability to taxpaying citizens must be taken seriously. And it starts with a radical rethink.


20 posted on 12/29/2016 8:50:12 AM PST by bioqubit (bioqubit: Educated Men Make Terrible Slaves - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson