Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux

Well, technically a rocket that just goes into orbit to ram a satellite (or even blow it up with a conventional warhead) does not violate any treaties. So Russia is as free to develop that technology as we are.


20 posted on 12/23/2016 8:43:39 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
Other nations then the US operate in space. Russia developing a defensive capacity like this does not automatically translate into a direct threat to the USA.
23 posted on 12/23/2016 8:48:22 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("The poltical class is a bureaucracy designed to perpetuate itself" Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman; RoosterRedux
So Russia is as free to develop that technology as we are.

That ship has sailed. To and from both continents. For over 35 years.

does not violate any treaties.

Well... the treaty was made AFTER THE FACT that both the US and USSR developed and launched and tested their anti-satellite weapons. Neither Russia nor the US wanted any 'competition' so they came up with the treaty to ensure no one else could put one of these in orbit. And they weren't the 'ramming' type.

I watched the DEMO of the Russian anti-sat. It was done over the US specifically so we could watch. The guy who developed the weapon that was on board the satellite defected to the US and helped us create one , in the hopes that with both sides having it, neither would use it. It has worked so far.

32 posted on 12/23/2016 9:45:11 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson