Privacy group: Let's see Russian hack evidence!

wnd.com ^ | 12/23/2016 | Bob Unruh

[rktman]

A privacy group that has dealt with a wide range of Web secrecy and other privacy issues has heard enough talking: It wants to see the evidence regarding the alleged Russian hack of the U.S. presidential election.

“The U.S. intelligence community has officially attributed the attacks [on Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee] on the Russian government, yet questions have been raised about the failure of the FBI to investigate that attacks on the political parties of the United States,” said the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

“The FBI is entrusted with protecting the cybersecurity of the public and its institutions. The American public, thus has a great interest in understanding the nature of the FBI’s response to the Russian interference with the 2016 presidential election,” the group said.

[rktman]

I am SOOOOOOO freakin' tired of this "excuse". What's even worse, the lying msm doesn't actually come out and say it but the implied/infered "interfered with the 2016 election", is misunderstood by a LOT of dumbasses to mean that the russians actually changed votes in voting machine systems. And they ain't gonna change their tune or correct that misunderstanding. If it causes more hate and discontent, to them, that's awesome. And the "true believers" ain't gonna buy it anyway. Grrrrrr!

[Nextrush]

I posted a quote from Peter Hitchens column of last Sunday Dec. 18th about Aleppo.

In the ‘rebel’ eastern area...”The zone was ruled without mercy by heavily armed Osama Bin Laden sympathizers, who were bombarding the west of the city with powerful artillery....”

We need to investigate why our ‘leaders’ like Obama, Clinton and John McCain, among others, supported the Al Qaeda forces in Syria.

Congress and the Justice Department both....

[grania]

I'd like to add to your mini-rant: What needs investigation is how sources with access to CIA information get away with leaking information to media sources.

It doesn't seem that anything the CIA does our says can be trusted. JMHO

[rktman]

It ain’t your grandfather’s OSS.

[Wolfie]

Oddly, I haven’t heard a.peep about Russian hacking from the MSM since the Electoral College.certified the election

[Jimmy The Snake]

And what about the DHS hack of the GA Voter DB? huh we don’t hear about that

[alloysteel]

As Julian Assange was saying all the time - it wasn’t the Russians.

[Zirondelle]

So true. It’s important until it isn’t.

[ptsal]

The problems seems to be resident in McLean, VA and in DC.

The Control-Left media just aids and abets the trouble-makers.

Why?

[Mr. K]

And its not as much about who ‘hacked’ them or if they were leaked from the inside... The real issue is THEIR CONTENTS.

By all means, try to find out (and stop it) if it is hackers, but that is not nearly as important as the criminal activity they show the clinton’s being guilty of.

[pas]

But 17 government security agencies said it happened. (Why the hell are there 17 different agencies in the first place) Can anyone name all 17 without looking them up?

[HLPhat]

>> Let’s see Russian hack evidence!

{ crickets crickets crickets }

[Milton Miteybad]

It was the Russians, I tell you. The Russians!