Posted on 12/22/2016 10:38:33 AM PST by detective
There are some who want sick perversion to be mainstreamed. Hell in a handbasket.
Are you saying FakeNews from TIF (The Irrelevance Front) ?
It’s all a lie.
Every time they use the word “girl” it’s in reference to a boy.
Every time they use the word “her” it’s replacing the word “him.”
Every time they use the word “she” it’s replacing the word “he.”
This is a boy.
He can dye his hair, have surgeries to add or remove parts, and be injected with any hormone or drug imaginable.
It changes nothing but his appearance.
He can call himself Jane, Mary or Nummy Muffin Cocoa Butter if he chooses.
It matters not.
Every cell in his body contains male DNA and whenever they divide they create the same male DNA.
He was born male and he will die male.
Objective truth is a real thing and it does exist.
I went to the article. They actually include a young, Muslim girl saying she would have more opportunity if she were a boy. WHAT? I thought transgenders have believed they were the other gender since birth??? People want to be trendy. Look at the attentions hat transgenders are receiving! There may be some people who genuinely have a personality disorder that has them believing that they should have been born the other gender. But pretending it is normal is just destructive. Johns Hopkins no longer does transgender surgeries as having the surgery has no impact on lessening the number of suicides in the community.
Been there. Done that. Although it was on the Kids edition.
.
We cancelled our subscription to National Propagandic when they published the “feathered dinosaur” scam.
Don’t miss it a bit.
.
You put an image of a boy on your cover and called it “transgender girl.” A lie, and you know it.
By doing that, you are trying to convince a few confused boys to have their weewee lopped off and to put on lipstick, and to finally get respect and recognition.
GOLDBERG pushing the agenda by taking advantage of a mentally ill boy.
I’m not going to give them a click.
I can’t think of any legitimate reason for why they published it. What was their reason? Let me guess...
- “Because we’re committed leftists and we’re working overtime to fundamentally change Nat Geo into a glossy version of Pravda”
- “We want to normalize deviant sexuality for children as well as for adults”
- “Look at meeeeeeee!”
- “We were expecting Hillary to be elected as President and were ‘rent-seeking’ to get lucrative grants from HHS”
- “Our current membership is largely made up of baby boomers who will be dying off (not soon enough for us!), and so we need to quickly find a replacement demographic for our subscribers - how about LGBTQ”
- “I wanted to impress my gay lover - it worked”
- “We can’t get away with publishing photos of bare-breasted African women anymore, so we’re experimenting with new ways of attracting readers”
- “Because I hate my Mommy”
- “Trans people are underserved with information about World Geography, and so we were just filling an important void in the marketplace”
- “Because we want to be ‘edgy’ and ‘in your face’ if you’re a normal person”
- “It was a simple editorial mistake that we unfortunately did not catch until after the issue had gone to the printers”
etc.
Because you are pandering to the latest PC fad — transgenderism. Next question.
Perhaps it is to show everyone that not getting your child proper mental health assistance is equal to child endangerment?
.
“Him” not “Her.”
Have they mutilated him yet?
.
30 years ago, people that dressed up little boys as girls would have been called perverts and pedos.
Today we call them parents.
Screw that magazine. I have tons of issues from the 90s and earlier. I almost want to chuck them all in the recycle bin.
More than a few have vowed to cancel their subscriptions. .................................. More than a few? How many is more than a few? A plethora? Do you know what a plethora eeez? BS, if it was just more than a few, they wouldn’t need to put in an excuse. I’ll go with the plethora!
.
There hasn’t been anything in any way scientific about National Propagandic for at least 30 years.
.
On one hand the left complains about gender stereotypes...
But then in order to fool people into thinking this boy is a girl, they slap stereotypical girl clothes and things on and around him, and say “WHY DONT YOU SEE THIS AS A GIRL???”.
National Geo is now (in)famous for doing shock jock crap.
Back during the Iraq war, they printed a photo that they initially insisted was real.
It showed a soldier pointing his weapon and warding at a dude holding a child.
Problem was, it was two photos spliced together.
Once caught, they printed a “fake but accurate” style explanation that they printed the image “because, reasons”.
And now?
Good luck finding it, the article “explanation” on it, or any mention of it now.
Oh, Nat Geo now has a policy “against” photoshopped images...
Why is the above important?
Well, it shows that Nat Geo has no interest in the truth, honesty, or even basic decency.
I will never be a subscriber again. Go ahead and stick the fork in me! I’m done.
“One of them was Avery. She has lived as an openly transgender girl since age five, and she captured the complexity of the conversation around gender. Today, we’re not only talking about gender roles for boys and girls—we’re talking about our evolving understanding of people on the gender spectrum.”
Sorry National Geojerks, there is NO way a 5 year old has any sense of something like this. Clearly, her parents have schooled her into this kind of idiocy and she is playing the role well. Equally clearly, the Geojerks have been shanghaied, like the Mainstream Media, many mainline Christine Churches, and the educational establishment, into believing all of this left wing political crap and into promoting it.
Its past time the conservatives in America struck back by starting their own newspapers, TV channels, schools and churches and working to either take over or undermine and destroy, those of their enemies.
If not, Avery or a lunatic Jihhadi represents America’s future.
Without subsidiary actions, Trump’s election will be but a minor blip on the political screen and the Evil Empire will either block him, or surge back in 2020.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.