Posted on 12/16/2016 9:29:56 AM PST by Non-Compliant_Deplorable
"...DOJ Attorney General Loretta Lynch has taken a step to come clean on the 2016 Election. She says, the United States intelligence community has not found any evidence of technical interference on the part of the Russian government on voting machines used in the 2016 election...this is a start for the DOJ in being honest with the American people, instead of protecting Hillary...and the Democrats...Assange...announced on FOX NEWS HANNITY last night that the WIKILEAKS source for DNC information was not Russia...WIKILEAKS had a strict policy of never revealing sources...He wants people to stop concentrating on the source of the leaks, and...focus on the actual information which was released..."
(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...
sure
Even in a washing machine she would not come clean.
GOT A NEW IDEA as to why they are now blaming the Russians... Because political donors like the Saudis want to know why Clinton lost. The Saudis are pissed and don’t like the reasons they have heard so far.
BUT HILLIARY SAYS IT WAS THE RUSSIANS AND THEY *ATTACKED* THE USA!!!
(sure, that’s the kind of level-headed leadership we need...Insult countries that have more nuclear bombs than us)
Yep, I don’t think Lynch is capable of “coming clean.” Posted this to hear what other Freepers think.
They are still parsing the words.
DOJ Attorney General Loretta Lynch “..has not found any evidence of technical interference on the part of the Russian government on voting machines..”
This is similar to what Obama said the other day.
But this still allows the FAKENEWS msm to run with the story of the Russians hacking the emails and influencing the election.
Yeah, Julian was not at all happy having to give any details whatsoever on sources, but he did anyway.
Democrats are reckless with their lies. They will say and do anything for power regardless of consequence.
They behave like criminal stalkers IMO. They believe they own American power and voters, and that they are entitled to us, and if they can’t have us, no one can.
They are dangerous.
She said the same thing last Monday.
No coverage from NBC Nightly...
To me, it sounds like she’s professing ignorance, not “coming clean”.
I still ponder whether it’s possible that Obama’s revenge was a special composition to Wikileaks. Makes sense in the light that he’s blaming someone else (Russia) for Hillary’s election loss.
Lock her up.
What? they're scrubbing her neck with a 3/4" sisal rope?
His biggest contribution in my opinion was to show beyond any question how the MSM is in the bag for Democrats.
Intriguing idea. Wonder if the saudis are stupid enough. But as they say, not my problem lol
Lock Loretta “cankles” Lynch up, along with H->!.
“I said, she is beginning to come clean, and this is a start for the Department of Justice in being honest with the American people, instead of protecting Hillary Clinton and the Democrats. I am very optimistic now this is a very positive step in the right direction for our Country. “
What an absolute CROCK! She’s probably concerned that her predecessor will prosecute her. For openers, she needs to come clean about her tarmac meeting with Slick Willie in AZ!
I might be inclined to forgive. Her work was good, pre DOJ in Brooklyn, NY.
She may have been ambushed by Bill Clinton in Phoenix last June and either thought no one was watching or that a meeting with a former president shouldn’t be turned down. Bill Clinton had nothing to lose with this meeting. She should have done the math, but when you have seconds to make a decision, she choked.
She recused herself from the HRC server investigation, and is trying to get back her reputation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.