Posted on 12/13/2016 10:09:12 AM PST by Enlightened1
Julian Assange always said Russian hackers were not his source for the emails that took down Hillary. He has never wavered, never changed his statement. His close associate, former British Ambassador (Uzbekistan) Craig Murray, has said the same. It was an inside job. Not Russian hackers.
These are the only two people in the world who know the source. Only two people who have actually met the source. Both deny Russian involvement. Both say it was a Clinton insider. After new calls from the democrats to investigate the leaks, a stunned Murray came forward again to set the record straight.
He said,
“There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption.”
“I know who leaked them.”
“I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian.”
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.”
CLOSE CLINTON CONFIDANT HATES HER MORE THAN PUTIN
The difference is that someone inside the DNC, a very close Clinton confidant, hates her more than Putin. Why else release evidence of her corruption and torpedo her coronation? Only someone close could have done this. And only someone close would have done this.
Because hatred that deep only comes from close association. It is impossible to have that much long-distance hate for someone you have never met.
Putin has no way of really knowing whether Trump or Clinton will be better for him either. He may have an idea, but to execute what he is accused of would be extremely hard, if not impossible. To try it, To risk WW3 on a coin flip seems absurd.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnewspolitics.com ...
Peshaw! An un-credible source. Not nearly as credible an an un-named source for the cia’s initial conclusion to rooskie tampering/hacking. /s
My opinion only.
Then again, the Democrats probably won't believe it... at least, publicly. Hey, maybe we need another wikileaks of high ranking Democrats discussing how they plan to blame the Russians for Hillary's loss. Lots of nugget in that email exchange, I bet.
“They”
Huma? She got screwed over the most and hillary mail was on weiner’s laptop
Hillary already knew. See Seth Rich murder which will remain unsolved.
How does that make him different from pretty much every human being?
Weiner himself has been, shall we say, experiencing an unusual amount of public exposure in recent times. These things are usually cleaned up for well-placed party insiders, so something is amiss above and beyond his personal perversities. As a result, I’d say it’s not entirely unlikely to be him, if not Seth Rich.
ML/NJ
Yep! The DNC needs to keep all those dogs-in-heat on shorter leashes...
If he knew anything about techie stuff I would say Bill Clinton (believe it or not) to be the leaker. There are a lot of reasons for him being the one. Perhaps he had someone do it for him....
And one of the DNC leakers already got whacked about 2 months ago walking on the street.
Why were we not investigating HIllary and Obama’s ineligibility?
Think about it. We were called birthers but never asked the Electors to rebuke Obama!!!
Who is racist, eh?
Murray called it Kafkaesque:
“.....It is far more likely he was simply amused by the whole sordid affair.
Murray took aim at the hapless establishment media for blatantly spreading the Russian lie calling them,
“Kafkaesque.””
Yea weiner is also nasty enough to do that.
Bernie and Debbie were also dumped but I don’t think they had it in them to exact revenge
I always joked that Bill ended up voting for Trump because they have a lot in common. But Bill also needs the Foundation
Did I say it did?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.