Posted on 12/12/2016 2:50:13 PM PST by billorites
Even as the city is sounding the alarm on climate changes impact on the future of life in Boston, one major developer remains skeptical.
John B. Hynes III is the CEO and managing partner of Boston Global Investors, which is developing much of the 23-acre, $3.5 billion Seaport Square project in South Boston. And while hes willing to build to state and local officials specifications, Hynes doesnt buy into the whole hullabaloo of raising sea levels and the like.
I have my doubts, Hynes told the Herald. The global warming phenomenon that everybodys worried about is nothing more than historic cycling.
Hynes reportedly cited a series of YouTube videos, which refer to climate change as a hoax.
There are two sets of scientists out there, theres a set that says global warming is real and theres another set that says the research is not conclusive. Everybody seems to ignore that voice and buy in to the other one, Hynes continued. If these guys are all right, I guess the next generation will be developing out in the Berkshires. Eastern Massachusetts will be under water, which is crazy Im not going to get into the science of it because theres too much science.
Hynesson of the late Channel 56 newsman Jack Hynes and grandson of John Hynes, the last man to unseat an incumbent mayor of Boston (the indefatigable James Michael Curley in 1949)said the Seaport Square developments power generators will not be kept in the basement. Thats probably a good thing, because the citys most gloom-and-doom estimates (whether Hynes believes them or not) predict a three-foot rise in sea-level if carbon emissions go unchecked.
OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the suns planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?
Anyone who chooses to locate near water should be free to do so. However, no FEMA or tax money should be spent to help it. No tax money should be spent to bail it out or rescue it. That includes tourist traps and casinos, fishing cabins and Martha’s Vineyard mansions.
Short term flooding from 10-year level rainstorms is enough reason to keep generators out of basements.
Short term flooding from 10-year level rainstorms is enough reason to keep generators out of basements.
As are particularly nasty Nor'easters that arrive at high tide!
Real scientists don’t “adjust” the raw data, much less do it based on preconceived ideas. They also don’t build computer models and adjust the variables until the model shows what they wanted it to show. Even though the model never has aligned with past data and the changes to the variables make it align even less. “Consensus” was not a term I EVER heard was a basis for scientific inquiry prior to the AGW scam.
The AGW Accolytes have painted themselves into a corner. Over 10 years of global warming brainwashing in schools, TV shows, Movies, political hearings, corporate mandates and mass media productions. They cannot give it up. They cannot make the switch to global cooling. They will go down with their Global Warming ship.
That somewhat depends on what time period is covered. The Earth is presently in a long term Ice Age, and an overall downward temperature trend over many millions of years, interrupted by relatively brief interglacial periods such as the one we now enjoy. There is little evidence to support a change in the Sun causing the long term trend, but there is SOME evidence that it has been caused by the rise of the Himalayas, and more recently the Isthmus of Panama.
Meanwhile, there is considerable argument as to what causes the periodic interglacials, why the cycle period changed several cycles back, why the cycles deepened, and more importantly in the short run, what triggers the end of each interglacial. Whatever it is, Man was not a factor in any of the previous cycles, and while the Sun might be a factor, the evidence is sketchy at best. Orbital forcing likely is a contributor, but even that is poorly understood (such as why have the cycles gone from 41 k years to ~ 100 k years, and why in some cases effect seems to precede cause.) There is, in short, much more that we do not know than what we do know.
What IS certain is that if humans are not a very wealthy, powerful, capable society, when the next period of glaciation comes, we'll be "pruned back" brutally.
One other interesting bit of information:
The Sun’s output is believed to be increasing 7% every billion years. Yet, since the Eocene Optimum (centered around 50 million years ago) through the average of the last million years or so, average global temperatures have fallen approx. 15 deg. C (or 27 deg. F.) That’s a lot!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.