Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DNC must reenact ban that was removed to enable Hillary Victory Fund
The Observer.com ^ | December 8, 2016 | Michael Sainato

Posted on 12/08/2016 1:49:25 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Despite Clinton's downfall, Democrats show little desire to abandon corporate and wealthy donors. After winning ... in 2008, Obama enacted a ban on lobbyists and PAC donations to the DNC. “We will not take a dime from Washington lobbyists or special interest PACs. We’re going to change how Washington works. They will not fund my party. They will not run our White House. And they will not drown out the voice of the American people when I’m president of the United States,” Obama told a crowd...... in 2008.

But in 2015, then-DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, without any protest from the Obama Administration, rescinded that ban. At the time, Sen. Bernie Sanders was emerging as a surprising viable challenger to Hillary Clinton’s candidacy. Sanders’ disavowal of accepting money from Super PACs helped create a grassroots fundraising machine which threatened to raise more money than Clinton’s campaign under the DNC rules at the time. Wasserman Schultz removed the ban on lobbyist and PAC donations, opening up the opportunity for the DNC and Clinton campaign to develop a joint fundraising committee, the Hillary Victory Fund, and reel in big donations.... The joint fund was exposed in May 2016 for laundering money through state Democratic Parties to circumvent campaign finance laws. “Less than 1 percent of the $61 million raised by that effort has stayed in the state parties’ coffers,”....

Wasserman Schultz would later resign in embarrassment after WikiLeaks released DNC emails that revealed she violated the DNC charter by transforming the neutrally bound organization into an extension of the Clinton campaign during the primaries. Her position as DNC chair was filled by another cheating Clinton campaign surrogate, Donna Brazile. WikiLeaks emails released from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta revealed Brazile forwarded CNN debate questions in advance in order to help his candidate.

Though Sanders and Clinton supporters are currently battling to prop up their preferred candidates for a new DNC chair, to be voted on in February, the ban initially enacted by Obama has not been re-instituted.........[snip] While Sanders has set out to mobilize millions of his supporters and voters disenfranchised from the Democratic Party, the party establishment has shown little desire to abandon their corporate and wealthy donors—despite the downfall of Clinton and the rise of Donald Trump that courtship has resulted in.

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi founded their careers on preserving the corporate elitist status quo. Schumer is one of Wall Street’s favorite donor recipients, and Pelosi suggested Sen. Elizabeth Warren is a fringe member of the Democratic Party because she criticizes Wall Street.

Clinton has ignored important issues that have arisen since her defeat but is hosting a thank you party for her millionaire donors in NYC. Shortly after the election, billionaire George Soros held a closed door meeting with other wealthy donors that was attended by high-profile Democrats. Clinton propagandist David Brock is still being given an earpiece in Democratic Party leadership circles and has a private retreat for the party’s billionaire donors planned in January.

The Democratic Party has not learned anything from Clinton’s embarrassing loss to Trump, and it won’t unless Sanders and his progressive supporters push to bring back the ban on lobbyist and PAC donations.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brazille; cheaters; democrats; dnc; dws; hillary; sanders; wasserman
No way will they truly abandon the lobbyist $$, wealthy corporate donors and PAC donations in favor of grassroots campaigning. It's easy money.
1 posted on 12/08/2016 1:49:25 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Obama in 2008: “We will not take a dime from Washington lobbyists or special interest PACs. We’re going to change how Washington works. They will not fund my party. They will not run our White House. And they will not drown out the voice of the American people when I’m president of the United States,”

Wow. There is not one thing the man has ever said that was not a lie.

2 posted on 12/08/2016 1:56:16 PM PST by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Why? (from their point of view). Obama just bundled the donations and hid them, rather than stopping them. She was just less competent in this area, as with so many others.


3 posted on 12/08/2016 1:56:30 PM PST by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sicon

Liars lie...that is what they do. No surprise here.


4 posted on 12/08/2016 2:07:37 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

He had unlimited access to Arab monies. In 2006 I spoke with an Iraqi Christian. He knew all about BHO before most Americans had hear of him. He stated that Sen. BHO had been to Damascus and met with the Arab heads of state. He had a promise the Middle East would triple any money any of his democrat or republican opponents would raise.

It appears millions of that money was unspent and they used it to run BHO infomercials for months after he took office.


5 posted on 12/08/2016 2:10:51 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies ('45 will be the best ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Now that is an interesting story.
Credible.
Barak was also on the radar of a few other folks before 2008.


6 posted on 12/08/2016 4:57:02 PM PST by SisterK (its a spiritual war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sicon

That probably includes “My name is Barack 0bama.”


7 posted on 12/08/2016 6:13:37 PM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson