I agree with you.
Someone had an ax to grind within the agency or someone came in and complained that they needed to grind their ax.
I have never known (close friend worked for a welfare agency) any "feel-good" activity to trigger a change of benefits unless it was a winning of the lottery...which actually happened, and should have happened.
I’m thinking someone got jealous, perhaps one of the name callers in the article.
They filed a complaint and the SSDI didn’t do a thorough investigation.
This offer by kind members of the public should not change someone’s status like this.
I don’t want to see SSDI abused, but this is clearly and instance where an exception could be made.
Condemning someone to a miserable life just because they have health problems and need SSDI, isn’t something we as a nation need to do.
All the abuses out there, and this is where they focus?
FAIL!