Posted on 11/27/2016 2:40:19 PM PST by Navy Patriot
No matter what the job is or the vocation a person has chosen, NO ONE has the right to make death threats to the point said person leaves that employment. Find the thretners and deal with them accordingly
Something has gone wrong...
It seems you clicked on a bad link and stumbled upon our 404 page
My computer downloads Peter Boyles daily. I haven’t listened recently, but I’m sure he’s been covering this.
To law enforcement only.........
See post #14
See post #14
She just laid down and gave him the win. Not a good move.
Agreed.
Carry a nice little .38.
I prefer a 10MM.
Snowflake—yeah, I’d say to..
I don't think so, now that I researched her a little, and the Left/Gubmint in Colorado is as bad now as Beria ever was.
The psychiatrist didn’t break HIPAA. She observed the Duty to Warn, which takes priority when there is a direct and credible threat.
Your link didn't do me any good other than locking up my computer for 10 minutes.
So tell me what it was about......
The guy’s a nut case. She has 2 small children.
Yes I think that’s right.
Yes I think that’s right.
Ain’t fundamental transformation grand?
American Vacuum, Sewing and Typewriter”. Making or selling typewriters doesn’t seem to be a good business model.
Making or selling typewriters doesn’t seem to be a good business model.
No, she didn't. (ex-)Reporter really damages her credibility with that statement.
.(j) Standard: Uses and disclosures to avert a serious threat to health or safety -
..(1) Permitted disclosures. A covered entity may, consistent with applicable law and standards of ethical conduct, use or disclose protected health information, if the covered entity, in good faith, believes the use or disclosure:
..(i)
(...A) Is necessary to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to the health or safety of a person or the public; and
...(B) Is to a person or persons reasonably able to prevent or lessen the threat, including the target of the threat;
45 CFR 164.512 - Uses and disclosures for which an authorization or opportunity to agree or object is not required.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/164.512
Nope, try again. I even included a citation in my earlier post if you want to look it up yourself. "...including the target of the threat"
Per post #13 —> “She told me he was ‘homicidal’ and was planning to kill me. The psychiatrist thought the threat was so credible, she broke HPPA laws (the laws that protect medical records of psychos, such as the theater shooter - James Holmes) to warn me.’ “”<—
Actually, the psychiatrist has no legal duty to warn the potential victim. Only Directly warn “law enforcement” officials, as you say.
It is then up to Law Enforcement Official(s) to take action, to further verify and or enlist the help of the psychiatrist, who reported his her assessment.
Otherwise, if alerting a potential victim directly, it can be construed as unprofessional behavior by the psychiatrist.
Colorado Ping ( Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
Not true The tarasoff decision. Duty to contact authorities and notify victim
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.